<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Managing multiple Qlikview Devlopers in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Managing-multiple-Qlikview-Devlopers/m-p/302532#M1320807</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We're trying to decide the best structure for providing Qlikview in our business and hoping from some advice.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We currently have a test server (Small Business Edition license) and a live server (with an enterprise license).We'll have 5 developers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Challenges with the current setup:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Development on a local machine is not practical (One Qlikview App (with all files) is 200 GB.)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Only two developers can be RDC to test Server as it is not a terminal server.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Development on local machine would require each user to have two named user CALs, as they can&lt;BR /&gt;only be leased twice (Leased on Live, Test and local)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One solution is to upgrade the test server to a Terminal server to get over the two current users limitation.&amp;nbsp; Also set resource (RAM / CPU) user quotas for each developer.&amp;nbsp; Then perform all development on the test server not the local (meaning we only need one user CAL per developer).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone else have experience of multiple developers working on one server and does this approach sound sensible?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would upgrading the SBE license to a Test license offer any distinct advantages?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mark &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(EDIT)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #636363; font-family: Arial; font-size: 12px; background-color: #fbfbde;"&gt;I've realised the above would allow development on the test server but would stop developers being able to view the test dashboard through the access point (not what we want).&amp;nbsp; Therefore we'll need to upgrade the test server license from SBE to a test server license so the Named CAL's are also on the test server.&amp;nbsp; (Also found a useful post on this subject here&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #fbfbde; font-size: 12px; font-family: Arial; color: blue;"&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.qlik.com/message/77331#77331" style="padding-top: 1px; padding-bottom: 1px; padding-left: 17px; color: #007fc0; zoom: 1; background-position: no-repeat no-repeat;" target="_blank"&gt;http://community.qlik.com/message/77331#77331&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Message was edited by: msheraton&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 18:19:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RedSky001</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-01-26T18:19:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Managing multiple Qlikview Devlopers</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Managing-multiple-Qlikview-Devlopers/m-p/302532#M1320807</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We're trying to decide the best structure for providing Qlikview in our business and hoping from some advice.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We currently have a test server (Small Business Edition license) and a live server (with an enterprise license).We'll have 5 developers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Challenges with the current setup:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Development on a local machine is not practical (One Qlikview App (with all files) is 200 GB.)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Only two developers can be RDC to test Server as it is not a terminal server.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Development on local machine would require each user to have two named user CALs, as they can&lt;BR /&gt;only be leased twice (Leased on Live, Test and local)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One solution is to upgrade the test server to a Terminal server to get over the two current users limitation.&amp;nbsp; Also set resource (RAM / CPU) user quotas for each developer.&amp;nbsp; Then perform all development on the test server not the local (meaning we only need one user CAL per developer).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone else have experience of multiple developers working on one server and does this approach sound sensible?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would upgrading the SBE license to a Test license offer any distinct advantages?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mark &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(EDIT)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #636363; font-family: Arial; font-size: 12px; background-color: #fbfbde;"&gt;I've realised the above would allow development on the test server but would stop developers being able to view the test dashboard through the access point (not what we want).&amp;nbsp; Therefore we'll need to upgrade the test server license from SBE to a test server license so the Named CAL's are also on the test server.&amp;nbsp; (Also found a useful post on this subject here&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #fbfbde; font-size: 12px; font-family: Arial; color: blue;"&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.qlik.com/message/77331#77331" style="padding-top: 1px; padding-bottom: 1px; padding-left: 17px; color: #007fc0; zoom: 1; background-position: no-repeat no-repeat;" target="_blank"&gt;http://community.qlik.com/message/77331#77331&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Message was edited by: msheraton&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 18:19:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Managing-multiple-Qlikview-Devlopers/m-p/302532#M1320807</guid>
      <dc:creator>RedSky001</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-26T18:19:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

