<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Performance question in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-question/m-p/564151#M1326934</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Henric's Blog has the answers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.qlik.com/blogs/qlikviewdesignblog/2013/10/22/a-myth-about-countdistinct#comment-10487"&gt;http://community.qlik.com/blogs/qlikviewdesignblog/2013/10/22/a-myth-about-countdistinct#comment-10487&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 11:47:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Colin-Albert</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-01-24T11:47:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance question</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-question/m-p/564150#M1326932</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm just now wondering whether there is a performance penaly when using a text field instead of number one in expressions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let's say I have the following fields among others:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- session_id which is a distinct number for each session with the following Qlikview tags ($key, $numeric, $integer) (e.g. 10340)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- id which is a distinct string for each session with the following Qlikview tags ($ascii, $text) (e.g. 0a0a24def1c42c6b14195ebdf9b3)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And then most of my charts are using expressions like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;COUNT(DISTINCT session_id)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My idea is just use id because it is already unique so will allow me remove session_id which I've to generate using sequences.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then the big question would be:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Will Qlikview perform as good as it is now? or by using text fields this would make qlikview performing really bad?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will do a test but before I'd like to gather some of your experience on this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ferran.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 18:19:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-question/m-p/564150#M1326932</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2026-01-26T18:19:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance question</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-question/m-p/564151#M1326934</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Henric's Blog has the answers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.qlik.com/blogs/qlikviewdesignblog/2013/10/22/a-myth-about-countdistinct#comment-10487"&gt;http://community.qlik.com/blogs/qlikviewdesignblog/2013/10/22/a-myth-about-countdistinct#comment-10487&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 11:47:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-question/m-p/564151#M1326934</guid>
      <dc:creator>Colin-Albert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-24T11:47:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance question</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-question/m-p/564152#M1326935</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I set your answer as helpful but I haven't been able to find an answer for my question in that thread.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ferran&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 13:29:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-question/m-p/564152#M1326935</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2014-01-24T13:29:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance question</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-question/m-p/564153#M1326936</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The comments against Henric's Blog have some options that are relevant to count performance and your specific question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The factor that seems to influence the count performance is whether the field you are counting is in the fact table or if you are counting a field in an associated table especially if there are multiple hops across other tables to the field.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 13:56:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-question/m-p/564153#M1326936</guid>
      <dc:creator>Colin-Albert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-24T13:56:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

