<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Data Model Question in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Data-Model-Question/m-p/402883#M1333371</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the transaction level data is stored in a separate QVW, then the performance of the summarize QVW should improve. So you'll have 2 QVW, one for summary and one for transaction. You can use "document chaining" to link these two QVW together.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 09:41:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator />
    <dc:date>2012-10-11T09:41:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Data Model Question</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Data-Model-Question/m-p/402882#M1333368</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my report I have a requirement to show transactions both at an aggregated level and at an individual transaction level, I have several million transactions (though selections have to be made before viewing this level).&amp;nbsp; Currently I import all data at transaction level only and Qlikview aggregates the values up where necessary.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is would I see a performance improvement if I created a table with values pre-aggregated and link that to a transactions table, take all aggregated values from the aggregated table and only use transaction level values when showing transaction level?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Appreciate any advice?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dominic&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 18:19:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Data-Model-Question/m-p/402882#M1333368</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2026-01-26T18:19:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data Model Question</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Data-Model-Question/m-p/402883#M1333371</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the transaction level data is stored in a separate QVW, then the performance of the summarize QVW should improve. So you'll have 2 QVW, one for summary and one for transaction. You can use "document chaining" to link these two QVW together.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 09:41:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Data-Model-Question/m-p/402883#M1333371</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2012-10-11T09:41:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

