<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Using Qlikview to Build Star in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Using-Qlikview-to-Build-Star/m-p/409993#M152480</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've been asked to explain why or why not and how one might build a star topology of data in QVD sets without the use of an ETL tool such as Expressor, Data Stage or Informatica.&amp;nbsp; Question is, has anyone attempted such an endeavor? If so, how well did it work out in terms of maintenance ease, extensibility, performance and data quality?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:55:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator />
    <dc:date>2012-10-12T19:55:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Using Qlikview to Build Star</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Using-Qlikview-to-Build-Star/m-p/409993#M152480</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've been asked to explain why or why not and how one might build a star topology of data in QVD sets without the use of an ETL tool such as Expressor, Data Stage or Informatica.&amp;nbsp; Question is, has anyone attempted such an endeavor? If so, how well did it work out in terms of maintenance ease, extensibility, performance and data quality?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:55:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Using-Qlikview-to-Build-Star/m-p/409993#M152480</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2012-10-12T19:55:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using Qlikview to Build Star</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Using-Qlikview-to-Build-Star/m-p/409994#M152481</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Probably half the QlikView data models out there are star schema built without using ETL tools, and the majority of the rest are probably snowflake schema.&amp;nbsp; As for why we use star schema, it's hard to be clear why we do.&amp;nbsp; QlikView can process any number of data structures, and they definitely don't have to be star or snowflake schema.&amp;nbsp; But the forum consensus seems to be that star and snowflake schemas just work best, are the most QlikView-friendly.&amp;nbsp; The required denormalization isn't an issue because it's only a reporting tool so all synchronization works one way, and because QlikView's data compression keeps the additional data from actually taking additional space.&amp;nbsp; The model itself is then pretty clean to look at, and pretty safe from loops, which are something that must be avoided in QlikView.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 20:13:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Using-Qlikview-to-Build-Star/m-p/409994#M152481</guid>
      <dc:creator>johnw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-12T20:13:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using Qlikview to Build Star</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Using-Qlikview-to-Build-Star/m-p/409995#M152482</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;John,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your reply.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I dropped the investigation last October, and began it again recently.&amp;nbsp; I'd like to see how the half Qlikview data models star schema based were built without a robust ETL tool.&amp;nbsp; Are there examples available somewhere?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The issues uncovered thus far concerning Qlikview itself is its inability to manage type 2 dimensions with surrogate keys.&amp;nbsp; This is not a criticism, but rather a statement of the Qlikview technology focus as it appears - perhaps correctly so - to be focused on the associative capabilities it does very well in presentation analytics.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So now I am investigating Qlikview Expressor3.9, and I am finding similar issues with it.&amp;nbsp; At present I don't see Expressor in competition with ETL tools such as DataStage or Informatica, but rather another tool for managing and extending Qlikview datasets initially created from a star topology created by other ETL technologies.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I find missing is a knowledge/experience base on using Qlikview Expressor to accomplish a managable and extendable star topology.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any information links appreciated that may help appropriately position and deploy the combination of these tools - DataStage, Qlikview Expressor, and Qlikview itself.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 22:07:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Using-Qlikview-to-Build-Star/m-p/409995#M152482</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2013-06-06T22:07:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

