topic super strange distribution in QlikView https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/super-strange-distribution/m-p/415967#M154686 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Hi,</P><P></P><P>I just discovered one super strange strange behavior of QV.</P><P>If we refer to the following, it's a distribution created for a QVW.</P><P>the NTNAME field is actually the <STRONG>CN </STRONG>object from <STRONG>LDAP</STRONG>.</P><P></P><P><IMG alt="1842.jpg" class="jive-image-thumbnail jive-image" onclick="" src="https://community.qlik.com/legacyfs/online/22011_1842.jpg" width="450" /></P><P></P><P></P><P></P><P>Now, take a look at the section access.</P><P>user type: All authenticated user.</P><P>and it's based on <STRONG>WINDOWS ID</STRONG> !!!</P><P><IMG alt="1844.jpg" class="jive-image-thumbnail jive-image" onclick="" src="https://community.qlik.com/legacyfs/online/22012_1844.jpg" width="450" /></P><P></P><P></P><P>Why are there such a gap? </P><P>aren't those distribution supposed to be standardized?</P><P></P><P>Imagine you have 200 users to distribute to, previously was CN object from LDAP.</P><P>and just because we switch to section access, we have to use WINDOWS ID?</P><P>isnt that strange? sooooo strange no? <IMG src="https://community.qlik.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/cry.png" /></P></BODY></HTML> Tue, 18 Sep 2012 08:26:10 GMT 2012-09-18T08:26:10Z super strange distribution https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/super-strange-distribution/m-p/415967#M154686 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Hi,</P><P></P><P>I just discovered one super strange strange behavior of QV.</P><P>If we refer to the following, it's a distribution created for a QVW.</P><P>the NTNAME field is actually the <STRONG>CN </STRONG>object from <STRONG>LDAP</STRONG>.</P><P></P><P><IMG alt="1842.jpg" class="jive-image-thumbnail jive-image" onclick="" src="https://community.qlik.com/legacyfs/online/22011_1842.jpg" width="450" /></P><P></P><P></P><P></P><P>Now, take a look at the section access.</P><P>user type: All authenticated user.</P><P>and it's based on <STRONG>WINDOWS ID</STRONG> !!!</P><P><IMG alt="1844.jpg" class="jive-image-thumbnail jive-image" onclick="" src="https://community.qlik.com/legacyfs/online/22012_1844.jpg" width="450" /></P><P></P><P></P><P>Why are there such a gap? </P><P>aren't those distribution supposed to be standardized?</P><P></P><P>Imagine you have 200 users to distribute to, previously was CN object from LDAP.</P><P>and just because we switch to section access, we have to use WINDOWS ID?</P><P>isnt that strange? sooooo strange no? <IMG src="https://community.qlik.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/cry.png" /></P></BODY></HTML> Tue, 18 Sep 2012 08:26:10 GMT https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/super-strange-distribution/m-p/415967#M154686 2012-09-18T08:26:10Z