<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Performance impact on including .QVW file. in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-impact-on-including-QVW-file/m-p/556709#M207824</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Sidharth,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think there is no difference between normal and Binary loads, the difference is Load time, Binary Load loads faster than Normal load. Check the file size and number of records between the two loads.&amp;nbsp; If data is huge, then may be the reports would load slower.&amp;nbsp; Also check that the data model is same between the two models.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jagan.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:41:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jagan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-07-09T13:41:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance impact on including .QVW file.</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-impact-on-including-QVW-file/m-p/556708#M207823</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi folks, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have to make a multple reports for different products.&lt;BR /&gt; Therefore i have developed a central data mart(.qvw) which is being imported by the &lt;STRONG&gt;Binary&lt;/STRONG&gt; keyword.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However doing this all my views in the child reports have a performance impact and the reports on a whole have gone slow.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have an idea why is this happening and how can i overcome this. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reports work fine if i include the data mart directly by putting the script and not use the include .QVW (Binary) command.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:24:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-impact-on-including-QVW-file/m-p/556708#M207823</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2013-07-09T13:24:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance impact on including .QVW file.</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-impact-on-including-QVW-file/m-p/556709#M207824</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Sidharth,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think there is no difference between normal and Binary loads, the difference is Load time, Binary Load loads faster than Normal load. Check the file size and number of records between the two loads.&amp;nbsp; If data is huge, then may be the reports would load slower.&amp;nbsp; Also check that the data model is same between the two models.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jagan.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:41:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-impact-on-including-QVW-file/m-p/556709#M207824</guid>
      <dc:creator>jagan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-09T13:41:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

