<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Performance issue in application of over 300 million records in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-issue-in-application-of-over-300-million-records/m-p/558099#M208316</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some best practices are discussed in &lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.qlik.com/thread/18473"&gt;this&lt;/A&gt; thread.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are also some best modelling practices documents under Documents section in this forum.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:24:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>swuehl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-07-10T12:24:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance issue in application of over 300 million records</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-issue-in-application-of-over-300-million-records/m-p/558098#M208315</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i wanted to know, how would you deal with 4 big fact tables (over 60 million rows each)?&amp;nbsp; If i concatenate two tables, one of 60 million and the other or 90 mio records, is the performance better than if i keep both tables separated? How can i separate historical data from actual, without loosing history? Do you have any experience with linked tables? how can i implement this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Opening a sheet object with many expressions inside (five to six columns calculating measures based on variables written in the script) takes between 5 to to 25 seconds. How can i speed this up?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;I did the following to make the document faster:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I load from a sql source DB, save as QVD in say QW_1 and transform the tables as i need them. Then i load to&amp;nbsp; a different document (QW_2) where i create my charts and add dimension tables, directly from the SQL source. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I deleted fields, when i did not need them, i flagged fields to use them in my expressions, and converted complex keys to integers, i tried to avoid count distincts (however in many cases it is not possible, when i have many dimensions associated to a, for example, customer history table), and joined some tables. Total application includes over 300 million records, fact and dimension tables (over 20).&amp;nbsp; Application size 5.1 Gb &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;any comemnt very welcome&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Felipe&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 17:25:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-issue-in-application-of-over-300-million-records/m-p/558098#M208315</guid>
      <dc:creator>felcar2013</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-09T17:25:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance issue in application of over 300 million records</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-issue-in-application-of-over-300-million-records/m-p/558099#M208316</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some best practices are discussed in &lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.qlik.com/thread/18473"&gt;this&lt;/A&gt; thread.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are also some best modelling practices documents under Documents section in this forum.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:24:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-issue-in-application-of-over-300-million-records/m-p/558099#M208316</guid>
      <dc:creator>swuehl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-10T12:24:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance issue in application of over 300 million records</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-issue-in-application-of-over-300-million-records/m-p/558100#M208317</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I checked it. There is a QV document on best practices (from 2011) and it talks about "document chaining". I could not find many discussion on this, and i only need basics, do you know if this can still be used? i work on QV 11 R2. I could not find anything on the Reference Manual, or my search function is not working&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 13:58:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-issue-in-application-of-over-300-million-records/m-p/558100#M208317</guid>
      <dc:creator>felcar2013</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-10T13:58:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance issue in application of over 300 million records</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-issue-in-application-of-over-300-million-records/m-p/558101#M208318</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Document chaining could indeed be quite useful for you. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, you can create an overview QVW on a higher aggregation level or without historic data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Only when someone needs to look into finer granularity / older records, you can refer him to a second qvw, passing the selection state to the second document.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This will allow that majority of users work with a smaller, better performing application, while only the 'power users' work with the big data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should find some threads / documents about document chaining in this forum, e.g.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" class="loading" href="https://community.qlik.com/thread/53743" title="http://community.qlik.com/thread/53743"&gt;http://community.qlik.com/thread/53743&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:28:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-issue-in-application-of-over-300-million-records/m-p/558101#M208318</guid>
      <dc:creator>swuehl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-10T14:28:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance issue in application of over 300 million records</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-issue-in-application-of-over-300-million-records/m-p/558102#M208319</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for the link and your help&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:03:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-issue-in-application-of-over-300-million-records/m-p/558102#M208319</guid>
      <dc:creator>felcar2013</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-10T15:03:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

