<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Rather complicated data problem in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Rather-complicated-data-problem/m-p/600014#M222069</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ok, now I think it is clear where our issue actually lies. However, I think it will be better to open a new thread and close this one so as not to overly confuse anyone looking in here with the intention of helping.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DataNibbler&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:17:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>datanibbler</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-02-18T14:17:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Rather complicated data problem</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Rather-complicated-data-problem/m-p/600011#M222066</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;we have a data_problem on the top_layer of our multi-layered architecture.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately, this must remain rather theoretic, the context is too big to post it all here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will try to formulate our current point_of_attack as clearly as possible and, if needed, I will post additional information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;- We have a big "DataModel" which is loaded BINARY into the app in question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- We have a nr. of items, each of which is uniquely identified by a number - which is now enhanced with the plant_key,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; as we have several plants =&amp;gt; looks like this: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp; 74|123456&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;&amp;lt; - that would be item # 123456 in plant 74&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- A varying number of these items are stored in packages, each of which has a unique package_ID.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- The packages have a certain status - "started" and "closed", to name only two. "Closed" is the last, logically.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Each item_nr. has certain time_measures associated, the time it takes to pack (in a box) and to process it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;=&amp;gt; So far for the most fundamental background.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;- The problem, as it is visible on the top_layer, is that the times are linked and visible for the packages only for the first&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; few values of "status"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;=&amp;gt; For status "closed" (the final one), the times are logically still there, but they are no longer displayed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;=&amp;gt; My current suspicion is a part in the script where those times are joined to another table from a "historization_table"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; that we make beforehand in another app because the database_table itself is not historized.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; =&amp;gt; I fixed something in that historization_app a while ago (because from one of several sources, data was not&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; in the same quality as that from the other sources) and I'm afraid that that change caused the error.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- The join is an IntervalMatch and my suspicion is that there is an error here. I will attach it here, I hope this is sufficient.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DataNibbler&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:45:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Rather-complicated-data-problem/m-p/600011#M222066</guid>
      <dc:creator>datanibbler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-18T10:45:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rather complicated data problem</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Rather-complicated-data-problem/m-p/600012#M222067</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you using that time as an expression? I mean just the field name without specifying an aggregation function. If so then the aggregation function only() is used implicitly. And that function can only return a result if there's only one possible value. So if you have two status times, for example because of an unintended result of a join, then no value would be shown. You can test this by replacing the implicit only() with an explicit max() or min(). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:12:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Rather-complicated-data-problem/m-p/600012#M222067</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gysbert_Wassenaar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-18T11:12:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rather complicated data problem</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Rather-complicated-data-problem/m-p/600013#M222068</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Gysbert,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for helping! The issue just started getting a bit more confused, though - I don't think there's much of a point in asking for help from the Community just now, before we know exactly whether the problem lies with QlikView or with the underlying data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think that there is a bit of confusion around here just now. Once we have got rid of that,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we might be able to figure out a solution ourselves - provided there really is a problem &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt; Right now, not even that is quite clear.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just tried, for that reason, to delete this thread altogether, but it seems you were too fast and I couldn't do it anymore.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DataNibbler&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:47:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Rather-complicated-data-problem/m-p/600013#M222068</guid>
      <dc:creator>datanibbler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-18T13:47:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rather complicated data problem</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Rather-complicated-data-problem/m-p/600014#M222069</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ok, now I think it is clear where our issue actually lies. However, I think it will be better to open a new thread and close this one so as not to overly confuse anyone looking in here with the intention of helping.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DataNibbler&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:17:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Rather-complicated-data-problem/m-p/600014#M222069</guid>
      <dc:creator>datanibbler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-18T14:17:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

