<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Generic table vs cross table in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Generic-table-vs-cross-table/m-p/632447#M232052</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is because of using generic load and cross table performance becomes better.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please suggest&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 10:54:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>deepakqlikview_123</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-05-29T10:54:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Generic table vs cross table</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Generic-table-vs-cross-table/m-p/632447#M232052</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is because of using generic load and cross table performance becomes better.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please suggest&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 10:54:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Generic-table-vs-cross-table/m-p/632447#M232052</guid>
      <dc:creator>deepakqlikview_123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-29T10:54:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Generic table vs cross table</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Generic-table-vs-cross-table/m-p/632448#M232053</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Better compared to what ? If you try to achieve the same using some scripting of your own or make changes to the source data format and apply a kind of transformation to get that, may be then, performance would be better, because a qv system function is always faster than it's counter part/ equivalent one which is user defined.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 10:59:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Generic-table-vs-cross-table/m-p/632448#M232053</guid>
      <dc:creator>tresB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-29T10:59:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Generic table vs cross table</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Generic-table-vs-cross-table/m-p/632449#M232054</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Tresco,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I mean compared to&amp;nbsp; just loading data in a normal way. and presenting as it is.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 11:02:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Generic-table-vs-cross-table/m-p/632449#M232054</guid>
      <dc:creator>deepakqlikview_123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-29T11:02:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Generic table vs cross table</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Generic-table-vs-cross-table/m-p/632450#M232055</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then it should be otherwise, that means loading data as it is should be faster, because that doesn't require any extra operation, while the generic/crosstable load performs some transformations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 11:06:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Generic-table-vs-cross-table/m-p/632450#M232055</guid>
      <dc:creator>tresB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-29T11:06:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

