<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Which approach is optimized in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Which-approach-is-optimized/m-p/666688#M242544</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have historical data and each week we are storing qvd's.it might be&amp;nbsp; for one year.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it depends on me to model data in such a way that weither row increased or column increase&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i am wonder which is best approach for future optimization preferences.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have also one point that qvd's store columnar data thats why they are optimized.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;don't know what is best optimized way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sunil &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 03:15:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SunilChauhan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-09-24T03:15:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Which approach is optimized</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Which-approach-is-optimized/m-p/666684#M242540</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hello all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have two approaches below&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. My column is increasing each week. i.e for each week date one column&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. second approach i have is&amp;nbsp; my rows are increasing week by week &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; each time week data is added and after concatenating its just doubles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so i would like to know which approach is better for optimization perspective.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sunil &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 02:50:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Which-approach-is-optimized/m-p/666684#M242540</guid>
      <dc:creator>SunilChauhan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-23T02:50:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which approach is optimized</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Which-approach-is-optimized/m-p/666685#M242541</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure if I understand it right - every week your data-sources increased with one column? Then you need to transform these data with crosstable to reach a data-stream instead a widely table. And you should consider to use incremental logics.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.qlik.com/docs/DOC-4597"&gt;Incremental Load&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Marcus&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:01:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Which-approach-is-optimized/m-p/666685#M242541</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcus_sommer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-23T09:01:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which approach is optimized</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Which-approach-is-optimized/m-p/666686#M242542</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Go with row wise data entry. it is the best approch&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:03:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Which-approach-is-optimized/m-p/666686#M242542</guid>
      <dc:creator>vinay_hg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-23T09:03:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which approach is optimized</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Which-approach-is-optimized/m-p/666687#M242543</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If new column are being added every week, I guess the column names are also different, In which case, you have to load * from table. I wonder how you handle field names of those columns in charts....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I think, as Vinay..had said, better to re arrange your dbase to row level data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:08:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Which-approach-is-optimized/m-p/666687#M242543</guid>
      <dc:creator>senarath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-23T09:08:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which approach is optimized</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Which-approach-is-optimized/m-p/666688#M242544</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have historical data and each week we are storing qvd's.it might be&amp;nbsp; for one year.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it depends on me to model data in such a way that weither row increased or column increase&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i am wonder which is best approach for future optimization preferences.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have also one point that qvd's store columnar data thats why they are optimized.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;don't know what is best optimized way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sunil &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 03:15:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Which-approach-is-optimized/m-p/666688#M242544</guid>
      <dc:creator>SunilChauhan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-24T03:15:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

