<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic different aggregation behaviour with missing values in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/different-aggregation-behaviour-with-missing-values/m-p/690414#M249979</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi everybody. I have the following simple data model:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;set NullInterpret ='';&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tab:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LOAD * INLINE [&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; A,&amp;nbsp; B&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10, 20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;];&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tbc:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LOAD * INLINE [&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; B,&amp;nbsp; C,&amp;nbsp; E&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 20, 31, 50&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;];&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tcd:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LOAD * INLINE [&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; C,&amp;nbsp; D&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 31, 40&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; , 42&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;];&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As you can see there is a missing value of C in the tcd table which is converted to null using NullInterpret .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The problem arises when I create the following charts:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="62535" alt="Cattura.PNG.png" class="jive-image" src="https://community.qlik.com/legacyfs/online/62535_Cattura.PNG.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I don't understand is why the aggregation on A does not display the 42 value of dimension D (which seems correct to me) while the aggregation on E displays it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only difference I see is that on A we have only 2 tables involved, while on E we have all the 3 tables involved.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can someone explain me?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Filippo&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:51:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator />
    <dc:date>2014-07-16T16:51:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>different aggregation behaviour with missing values</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/different-aggregation-behaviour-with-missing-values/m-p/690414#M249979</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi everybody. I have the following simple data model:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;set NullInterpret ='';&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tab:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LOAD * INLINE [&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; A,&amp;nbsp; B&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10, 20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;];&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tbc:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LOAD * INLINE [&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; B,&amp;nbsp; C,&amp;nbsp; E&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 20, 31, 50&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;];&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tcd:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LOAD * INLINE [&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; C,&amp;nbsp; D&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 31, 40&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; , 42&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;];&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As you can see there is a missing value of C in the tcd table which is converted to null using NullInterpret .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The problem arises when I create the following charts:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="62535" alt="Cattura.PNG.png" class="jive-image" src="https://community.qlik.com/legacyfs/online/62535_Cattura.PNG.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I don't understand is why the aggregation on A does not display the 42 value of dimension D (which seems correct to me) while the aggregation on E displays it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only difference I see is that on A we have only 2 tables involved, while on E we have all the 3 tables involved.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can someone explain me?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Filippo&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:51:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/different-aggregation-behaviour-with-missing-values/m-p/690414#M249979</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2014-07-16T16:51:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

