<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Serious bug discovered in SR8? in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Serious-bug-discovered-in-SR8/m-p/768500#M272921</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the version 11 SR8 and noticed a weird behaviour of the function "concat" used with the "monthname" function. I have this function inside a variable:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE border="1"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;=Concat(DISTINCT{1} Monthname(DATE_START),';',Monthname(DATE_START)) &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;but it doesn't concatenate the values.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I made a test with a previous SR and the issue didn't occur. Is it a known bug? I consider it a very serious problem as I have several applications working on that function.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 10:31:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator />
    <dc:date>2014-11-05T10:31:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Serious bug discovered in SR8?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Serious-bug-discovered-in-SR8/m-p/768500#M272921</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the version 11 SR8 and noticed a weird behaviour of the function "concat" used with the "monthname" function. I have this function inside a variable:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE border="1"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;=Concat(DISTINCT{1} Monthname(DATE_START),';',Monthname(DATE_START)) &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;but it doesn't concatenate the values.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I made a test with a previous SR and the issue didn't occur. Is it a known bug? I consider it a very serious problem as I have several applications working on that function.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 10:31:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Serious-bug-discovered-in-SR8/m-p/768500#M272921</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2014-11-05T10:31:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Serious bug discovered in SR8?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Serious-bug-discovered-in-SR8/m-p/768501#M272922</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since QV 11.0 doesn't have a SR8 I assume you mean 11.20 SR8. I can't reproduce this using QV 11.20 SR8 64-bit. Can you post a document that demonstrates the problem?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 14:51:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Serious-bug-discovered-in-SR8/m-p/768501#M272922</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gysbert_Wassenaar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-06T14:51:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

