<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic using an aggregated field also as a filter in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/using-an-aggregated-field-also-as-a-filter/m-p/778725#M276027</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i want to use an aggregated field as a filter as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i work at a company that sells an app for improving the install rate of applications (like hotels.com). some of the installs are invalid though due to technical issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have a column that sums all the valid installs (sum(valid_installs)).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the field "valid installs" shows 0 for invalid install and 1 for valid install.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i want to be able to filter the data with this field, so to create a list box on the side that shows the values "1" and "0".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the problem is that in the loading process i have an aggregation on the field so i can't show it again in the Load clause.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we use amazon redshift database so the option of using partitions (like in oracle) is irrelevant.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;would appreciate a solution to problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:40:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator />
    <dc:date>2015-01-28T08:40:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>using an aggregated field also as a filter</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/using-an-aggregated-field-also-as-a-filter/m-p/778725#M276027</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i want to use an aggregated field as a filter as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i work at a company that sells an app for improving the install rate of applications (like hotels.com). some of the installs are invalid though due to technical issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have a column that sums all the valid installs (sum(valid_installs)).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the field "valid installs" shows 0 for invalid install and 1 for valid install.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i want to be able to filter the data with this field, so to create a list box on the side that shows the values "1" and "0".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the problem is that in the loading process i have an aggregation on the field so i can't show it again in the Load clause.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we use amazon redshift database so the option of using partitions (like in oracle) is irrelevant.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;would appreciate a solution to problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:40:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/using-an-aggregated-field-also-as-a-filter/m-p/778725#M276027</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2015-01-28T08:40:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: using an aggregated field also as a filter</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/using-an-aggregated-field-also-as-a-filter/m-p/778726#M276028</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Yaron,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if you are aggregating this field up in your script. You are loosing the more granular data regarding if a specific installation was valid or not and as you rightly say your field will no long be just 1 or 0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is if you are only using that field for the expression sum(valid_installs), why the need to aggregate? If you don't aggregate the field you can still use that expression and then be able to bring the field in as a listbox too?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hope that helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Joe&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:13:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/using-an-aggregated-field-also-as-a-filter/m-p/778726#M276028</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2015-01-28T09:13:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: using an aggregated field also as a filter</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/using-an-aggregated-field-also-as-a-filter/m-p/778727#M276029</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;indeed, your suggestion makes sense.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i wonder though, whether that wouldn't slow down the process.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;currently the aggregations are built like this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hourly aggregation upon which the daily aggregation is built upon which the weekly upon which the monthly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i suppose cancelling this step, and making all the aggregation in the UI might cause the program to slow down, wouldn't it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:42:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/using-an-aggregated-field-also-as-a-filter/m-p/778727#M276029</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2015-01-28T09:42:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

