<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Star Schema Without Center Fact in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Star-Schema-Without-Center-Fact/m-p/837850#M294581</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Petter,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if it regarding the subset-ratio here my subset-ratio of each table:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Fact &lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SubsetRatio = 87%&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Information Density = 99.72%&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Product&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;SubsetRatio =&lt;/SPAN&gt; 93%&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Information Density = 100%&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;MasterPolicyAgent&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;SubsetRatio =&lt;/SPAN&gt; 50%&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Information Density = 99.94%&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;MasterCustomer&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;SubsetRatio =&lt;/SPAN&gt; 99.22%&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Information Density = 100%&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;indeed this data model look rather peculiar that why I a bit worry regarding this kind of modeling. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Suryanto&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 05:43:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-04-28T05:43:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Star Schema Without Center Fact</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Star-Schema-Without-Center-Fact/m-p/837846#M294577</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what will happen if I have this kind of star schema? is it will cause me worst performance compare to snowflake?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="Capture.PNG" class="jive-image image-1" src="https://community.qlik.com/legacyfs/online/85198_Capture.PNG" style="height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;%Key is consist of ApplicationNumber &amp;amp; ' - ' &amp;amp;SourceDatabase. the data can't joined or concatenate since concatenation will cause the data lost information that needed while join will cause memory to overload.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &amp;amp; Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Suryanto&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 05:05:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Star-Schema-Without-Center-Fact/m-p/837846#M294577</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-28T05:05:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Star Schema Without Center Fact</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Star-Schema-Without-Center-Fact/m-p/837847#M294578</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There might be some more points to consider when talking about the performance of a certain schema, e.g. the cardinality of the fields (# of distinct values), common dimensions that might be better solved via a link table between different fact tables. But this should be tested - if you worry about the performance, you should create some dummy data to see how the performance suffers with increasing amount of data. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also ensure that the %Keys are created with AutoNumber() as sequential consecutive numbers are much better then a compound string. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 05:22:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Star-Schema-Without-Center-Fact/m-p/837847#M294578</guid>
      <dc:creator>danieloberbilli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-28T05:22:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Star Schema Without Center Fact</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Star-Schema-Without-Center-Fact/m-p/837848#M294579</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It all depends on the number of rows of the involved tables. And the cardinality and subset-ratio of the %Key.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In some cases this could work if you have a small data model or just one table with many rows.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But at first glance this data model looks rather peculiar.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suspect that an analysis of your underlying data and tables could lead to a good star-schema.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 05:25:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Star-Schema-Without-Center-Fact/m-p/837848#M294579</guid>
      <dc:creator>petter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-28T05:25:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Star Schema Without Center Fact</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Star-Schema-Without-Center-Fact/m-p/837849#M294580</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Daniel,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in this current modeling the value already created to have one to one relation and believe there no worry for distinct value since the relation currently one to one. but i just think this table a bit odd to me and I just worry with this kind of modeling. the %Key itself need to be created such way since the data source come from 5 different database and the ApplicationNumbers are auto generate by the system, so it possible to have same ApplicationNumber from each source.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Suryanto&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 05:36:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Star-Schema-Without-Center-Fact/m-p/837849#M294580</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-28T05:36:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Star Schema Without Center Fact</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Star-Schema-Without-Center-Fact/m-p/837850#M294581</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Petter,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if it regarding the subset-ratio here my subset-ratio of each table:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Fact &lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SubsetRatio = 87%&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Information Density = 99.72%&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Product&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;SubsetRatio =&lt;/SPAN&gt; 93%&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Information Density = 100%&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;MasterPolicyAgent&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;SubsetRatio =&lt;/SPAN&gt; 50%&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Information Density = 99.94%&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;MasterCustomer&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;SubsetRatio =&lt;/SPAN&gt; 99.22%&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Information Density = 100%&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;indeed this data model look rather peculiar that why I a bit worry regarding this kind of modeling. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Suryanto&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 05:43:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Star-Schema-Without-Center-Fact/m-p/837850#M294581</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-28T05:43:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Star Schema Without Center Fact</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Star-Schema-Without-Center-Fact/m-p/837851#M294582</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Here my Approach is crate a &lt;STRONG&gt;LINKTABEL &lt;/STRONG&gt;that will give better and better performance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Manju&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 05:49:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Star-Schema-Without-Center-Fact/m-p/837851#M294582</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2015-04-28T05:49:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

