<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Modifying My Set Analysis in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Modifying-My-Set-Analysis/m-p/153415#M30456</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have several 'Times Contacted' fields that are banded into ranges and I am determining what the indexes are for those people who are Do Not Contacts versus those who are not (to determine what is the over/under on # of contacts). I have the following Set Analysis statement to figure out what the index is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(SUM({$&amp;lt;Do_Not_Contact={'Y'}&amp;gt;} Customer_Counter) / SUM({$&amp;lt;Do_Not_Contact={'Y'}&amp;gt;} TOTAL Customer_Counter)) / (SUM({$&amp;lt;Do_Not_Contact={'N'}&amp;gt;} Customer_Counter) / SUM({$&amp;lt;Do_Not_Contact={'N'}&amp;gt;} TOTAL Customer_Counter)) * 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This works great on the 'Overall Times Contacted' table because every record has a dimensional value of at least 1. However, when I get to vertical-specific report (ie Times Contacted VM) I have dimensions that are NULL because they may not have been contacted via phone. How should I modify my Set Analysis to knock out those NULL values, as they skew my results?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jeff&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:11:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator />
    <dc:date>2009-11-16T23:11:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Modifying My Set Analysis</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Modifying-My-Set-Analysis/m-p/153415#M30456</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have several 'Times Contacted' fields that are banded into ranges and I am determining what the indexes are for those people who are Do Not Contacts versus those who are not (to determine what is the over/under on # of contacts). I have the following Set Analysis statement to figure out what the index is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(SUM({$&amp;lt;Do_Not_Contact={'Y'}&amp;gt;} Customer_Counter) / SUM({$&amp;lt;Do_Not_Contact={'Y'}&amp;gt;} TOTAL Customer_Counter)) / (SUM({$&amp;lt;Do_Not_Contact={'N'}&amp;gt;} Customer_Counter) / SUM({$&amp;lt;Do_Not_Contact={'N'}&amp;gt;} TOTAL Customer_Counter)) * 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This works great on the 'Overall Times Contacted' table because every record has a dimensional value of at least 1. However, when I get to vertical-specific report (ie Times Contacted VM) I have dimensions that are NULL because they may not have been contacted via phone. How should I modify my Set Analysis to knock out those NULL values, as they skew my results?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jeff&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:11:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Modifying-My-Set-Analysis/m-p/153415#M30456</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2009-11-16T23:11:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Modifying My Set Analysis</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Modifying-My-Set-Analysis/m-p/153416#M30457</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would create a table with a 'N' value where not exists keys for these missing people...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:22:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Modifying-My-Set-Analysis/m-p/153416#M30457</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2009-11-16T23:22:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Modifying My Set Analysis</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Modifying-My-Set-Analysis/m-p/153417#M30458</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, if I had three distinct fields (one VM, one DM, and one EM) I would then need three distinct tables holding 'N' values for each one individually, correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:12:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Modifying-My-Set-Analysis/m-p/153417#M30458</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2009-11-17T21:12:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

