<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic How to structure the transformation layer in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/How-to-structure-the-transformation-layer/m-p/879568#M307035</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recently came across a question regarding the organization of the transformation layer of my Qlikview projects.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After I extract the data I need from our ERP, I have one application per object, where I created dimensional and facts qvds (for optimized loads in the load layer). For instance, I have:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Customers.qvd&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Products.qvd&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- SalesOrders.qvd (which creates DIM_SalesOrders.qvd and FAC_SalesReport_SalesOrders.qvd for instance)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- SalesDeliveries.qvd&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- SalesInvoices.qvd&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;etc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And I reload these applications one after the other.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But I was recently asked to create an application on service rate, for which I need data from both sales orders and sales deliveries. Now, my first reflex would have been to create a new fact table in SalesOrders.qvd, because this service rate needs to be calculated by order line. However, to do this, I needed data from SalesDeliveries.qvd which was not updated yet, so I ended up creating my new fact table in SalesDeliveries.qvd.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, what is the recommendation? Should I have one transform application per object, or put them together into one big application?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 09:57:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator />
    <dc:date>2015-06-23T09:57:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How to structure the transformation layer</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/How-to-structure-the-transformation-layer/m-p/879568#M307035</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recently came across a question regarding the organization of the transformation layer of my Qlikview projects.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After I extract the data I need from our ERP, I have one application per object, where I created dimensional and facts qvds (for optimized loads in the load layer). For instance, I have:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Customers.qvd&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Products.qvd&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- SalesOrders.qvd (which creates DIM_SalesOrders.qvd and FAC_SalesReport_SalesOrders.qvd for instance)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- SalesDeliveries.qvd&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- SalesInvoices.qvd&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;etc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And I reload these applications one after the other.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But I was recently asked to create an application on service rate, for which I need data from both sales orders and sales deliveries. Now, my first reflex would have been to create a new fact table in SalesOrders.qvd, because this service rate needs to be calculated by order line. However, to do this, I needed data from SalesDeliveries.qvd which was not updated yet, so I ended up creating my new fact table in SalesDeliveries.qvd.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, what is the recommendation? Should I have one transform application per object, or put them together into one big application?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 09:57:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/How-to-structure-the-transformation-layer/m-p/879568#M307035</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2015-06-23T09:57:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

