topic Re: Alternative approach for Bridge table (for better performance) in QlikView https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Alternative-approach-for-Bridge-table-for-better-performance/m-p/1056055#M353992 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P><A href="https://community.qlik.com/message/756728">Re: link table</A></P><P><IMG alt="Capture.JPG" class="jive-image image-1" src="https://community.qlik.com/legacyfs/online/113656_Capture.JPG" style="height: 145px; width: 620px;" /></P></BODY></HTML> Fri, 05 Feb 2016 07:15:12 GMT settu_periasamy 2016-02-05T07:15:12Z Alternative approach for Bridge table (for better performance) https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Alternative-approach-for-Bridge-table-for-better-performance/m-p/1056052#M353989 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Hi Experts,</P><P></P><P>In my case, I am using <STRONG>"Bridge Table"</STRONG>.(But it is taking <STRONG>long time</STRONG> to reload the data model).</P><P>Is there any alternative approach ?</P><P></P><P>Please suggest to me...</P><P></P><P>Thanks,</P><P>Madhu</P></BODY></HTML> Fri, 05 Feb 2016 06:57:00 GMT https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Alternative-approach-for-Bridge-table-for-better-performance/m-p/1056052#M353989 madhubabum 2016-02-05T06:57:00Z Re: Alternative approach for Bridge table (for better performance) https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Alternative-approach-for-Bridge-table-for-better-performance/m-p/1056053#M353990 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Hi,</P><P></P><P>Means link tables , </P><P></P><P>With so many Fact tables? Slowly Changing Dimensions.</P><P></P><P>or </P><P></P><P>Date fields more than two, such as canonical Dates .</P><P></P><P>Can your explain example of your Data Model!!</P><P></P><P>-Hirish</P></BODY></HTML> Fri, 05 Feb 2016 07:01:48 GMT https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Alternative-approach-for-Bridge-table-for-better-performance/m-p/1056053#M353990 HirisH_V7 2016-02-05T07:01:48Z Re: Alternative approach for Bridge table (for better performance) https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Alternative-approach-for-Bridge-table-for-better-performance/m-p/1056054#M353991 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Bridge Tables? </P></BODY></HTML> Fri, 05 Feb 2016 07:09:10 GMT https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Alternative-approach-for-Bridge-table-for-better-performance/m-p/1056054#M353991 Anonymous 2016-02-05T07:09:10Z Re: Alternative approach for Bridge table (for better performance) https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Alternative-approach-for-Bridge-table-for-better-performance/m-p/1056055#M353992 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P><A href="https://community.qlik.com/message/756728">Re: link table</A></P><P><IMG alt="Capture.JPG" class="jive-image image-1" src="https://community.qlik.com/legacyfs/online/113656_Capture.JPG" style="height: 145px; width: 620px;" /></P></BODY></HTML> Fri, 05 Feb 2016 07:15:12 GMT https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Alternative-approach-for-Bridge-table-for-better-performance/m-p/1056055#M353992 settu_periasamy 2016-02-05T07:15:12Z Re: Alternative approach for Bridge table (for better performance) https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Alternative-approach-for-Bridge-table-for-better-performance/m-p/1056056#M353993 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Hi,</P><P></P><P>Try Concatenate in your scenario. All fields take into one table.</P><P></P><P>Regards.</P></BODY></HTML> Fri, 05 Feb 2016 07:44:29 GMT https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Alternative-approach-for-Bridge-table-for-better-performance/m-p/1056056#M353993 mithilesh17 2016-02-05T07:44:29Z Re: Alternative approach for Bridge table (for better performance) https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Alternative-approach-for-Bridge-table-for-better-performance/m-p/1056057#M353994 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>HI,</P><P>Attach some sample data so that it would be easier to suggest the solution, otherwise it is difficult.</P><P></P><P>Regards,</P><P>Jagan.</P></BODY></HTML> Fri, 05 Feb 2016 07:59:15 GMT https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Alternative-approach-for-Bridge-table-for-better-performance/m-p/1056057#M353994 jagan 2016-02-05T07:59:15Z Re: Alternative approach for Bridge table (for better performance) https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Alternative-approach-for-Bridge-table-for-better-performance/m-p/2003354#M1221461 <P>Bridge table isn't the problem, it depends on how your script your data load</P> <P>&nbsp;</P> <P>&nbsp;</P> Fri, 11 Nov 2022 05:38:33 GMT https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Alternative-approach-for-Bridge-table-for-better-performance/m-p/2003354#M1221461 vinieme12 2022-11-11T05:38:33Z