<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Speeding up aggr in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Speeding-up-aggr/m-p/1256917#M397046</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A kpi with a complex aggr (averaging 10,000,000 detail rows over customer, region).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The customer and sales date are in dimension tables and the sales amount is in a central fact table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've thought about creating an autonumber for the customer and sales date.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would aggr run faster if it was using numerical dimensions rather than string?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What impact do large tables have on aggr?&amp;nbsp; If the customer table was 50 fields and the fact table had 100 measures.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the aggr was using in a calculation, would variables help instead of having complex expressions?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 13:17:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>markp201</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-01-01T13:17:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Speeding up aggr</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Speeding-up-aggr/m-p/1256917#M397046</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A kpi with a complex aggr (averaging 10,000,000 detail rows over customer, region).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The customer and sales date are in dimension tables and the sales amount is in a central fact table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've thought about creating an autonumber for the customer and sales date.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would aggr run faster if it was using numerical dimensions rather than string?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What impact do large tables have on aggr?&amp;nbsp; If the customer table was 50 fields and the fact table had 100 measures.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the aggr was using in a calculation, would variables help instead of having complex expressions?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 13:17:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Speeding-up-aggr/m-p/1256917#M397046</guid>
      <dc:creator>markp201</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-01T13:17:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Speeding up aggr</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Speeding-up-aggr/m-p/1256918#M397047</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;where are you using AGGR()&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; , straight table or Textbox?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;have you considered aggregating the measure during load, instead of front end?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 14:07:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Speeding-up-aggr/m-p/1256918#M397047</guid>
      <dc:creator>vinieme12</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-01T14:07:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Speeding up aggr</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Speeding-up-aggr/m-p/1256919#M397048</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;textbox (kpi).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see - something like this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AggrTable:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SELECT autonumber(customer&amp;amp;region,'aggrkey') as aggrkey,sum(salesamount)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;RESIDENT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; facts&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Add this to the fact&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;autonumber(customer&amp;amp;region,'aggrkey') as aggrkey&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 15:12:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Speeding-up-aggr/m-p/1256919#M397048</guid>
      <dc:creator>markp201</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-01T15:12:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Speeding up aggr</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Speeding-up-aggr/m-p/1256920#M397049</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13px; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; color: #3d3d3d;"&gt;AggrTable:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13px; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; color: #3d3d3d;"&gt;SELECT autonumber(customer&amp;amp;region,'aggrkey') as aggrkey,sum(salesamount)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13px; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; color: #3d3d3d;"&gt;RESIDENT facts&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13px; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; color: #3d3d3d;"&gt;Group By customer, region;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13px; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; color: #3d3d3d;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13px; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; color: #3d3d3d;"&gt;autonumber will help you to reduce the space of your application. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 17:03:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Speeding-up-aggr/m-p/1256920#M397049</guid>
      <dc:creator>MK_QSL</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-01T17:03:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Speeding up aggr</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Speeding-up-aggr/m-p/1256921#M397050</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In a dimensional mode, the customer and region are in their respective tables.&amp;nbsp; I think you would need a join clause for the group by, correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 21:03:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Speeding-up-aggr/m-p/1256921#M397050</guid>
      <dc:creator>markp201</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-01T21:03:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

