<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Nocontenate every load in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Nocontenate-every-load/m-p/1525918#M438408</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As much as the 'auto-concatenate' feature tries to be helpful, many a development session has been blasted away as puzzled developers try to figure out &lt;EM&gt;"what happened to my table?!"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Such as a tricky situation like placeholders. If there's no performance hit for using NOCONCATENATE I wouldn't be too hard on them &lt;EM&gt;(in a defensive programming world, are they doing any harm?)&lt;/EM&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="1"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color="#800000" size="1"&gt;[PLACEHOLDER_FOR_TABLE_1]&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size="1"&gt;:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff" size="1"&gt;LOAD&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT size="1"&gt; 1 &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff" size="1"&gt;AS&lt;/FONT&gt; &lt;FONT color="#800000" size="1"&gt;ID&lt;/FONT&gt; &lt;FONT color="#0000ff" size="1"&gt;AUTOGENERATE&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size="1"&gt; (0);&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color="#008000" size="1"&gt;//.....some scripting later //&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size="1"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color="#800000" size="1"&gt;[PLACEHOLDER_FOR_TABLE_2]&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size="1"&gt;:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff" size="1"&gt;LOAD&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT size="1"&gt; 1 &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff" size="1"&gt;AS&lt;/FONT&gt; &lt;FONT color="#800000" size="1"&gt;ID&lt;/FONT&gt; &lt;FONT color="#0000ff" size="1"&gt;AUTOGENERATE&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size="1"&gt; (0);&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color="#008000" size="1"&gt;//** What happened to my second target table?! &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've had "clever" experiences where when auto-concatenate is in effect, a seeming innocuous later date change subtlely aligns two formerly disparate table structures into a unified one and results in&amp;nbsp;unintended auto-concatenation never meant to be such, and becomes a big headache.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Be cautious when presented with the innocent request (many months later) for &lt;EM&gt;"would itttt be hard to rename this one field from [BlaBla] to [BlablaBla]?"&lt;/EM&gt; You might be getting set-up.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 15:35:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>evan_kurowski</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-01-03T15:35:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Nocontenate every load</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Nocontenate-every-load/m-p/1525865#M438404</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Normally, noconcatenate is used override qlik default behaviour when table structures match.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any issues (performance or otherwise)&amp;nbsp; with adding noconcatenate to every load even when the structures don't match?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2024 04:51:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Nocontenate-every-load/m-p/1525865#M438404</guid>
      <dc:creator>markp201</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-16T04:51:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nocontenate every load</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Nocontenate-every-load/m-p/1525891#M438406</link>
      <description>Why do you want to do that?&lt;BR /&gt;I wouldnt assume there will be much of overhead as far as running the script is concerned. unless there is multicolumn synthetic keys</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 14:31:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Nocontenate-every-load/m-p/1525891#M438406</guid>
      <dc:creator>dplr-rn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-03T14:31:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nocontenate every load</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Nocontenate-every-load/m-p/1525907#M438407</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Our developer in this case is just a novice.&amp;nbsp; Its just confusing to support this because when I see noconcatenate, the first thing I look for is which table has the same structure.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 15:00:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Nocontenate-every-load/m-p/1525907#M438407</guid>
      <dc:creator>markp201</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-03T15:00:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nocontenate every load</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Nocontenate-every-load/m-p/1525918#M438408</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As much as the 'auto-concatenate' feature tries to be helpful, many a development session has been blasted away as puzzled developers try to figure out &lt;EM&gt;"what happened to my table?!"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Such as a tricky situation like placeholders. If there's no performance hit for using NOCONCATENATE I wouldn't be too hard on them &lt;EM&gt;(in a defensive programming world, are they doing any harm?)&lt;/EM&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="1"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color="#800000" size="1"&gt;[PLACEHOLDER_FOR_TABLE_1]&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size="1"&gt;:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff" size="1"&gt;LOAD&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT size="1"&gt; 1 &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff" size="1"&gt;AS&lt;/FONT&gt; &lt;FONT color="#800000" size="1"&gt;ID&lt;/FONT&gt; &lt;FONT color="#0000ff" size="1"&gt;AUTOGENERATE&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size="1"&gt; (0);&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color="#008000" size="1"&gt;//.....some scripting later //&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size="1"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color="#800000" size="1"&gt;[PLACEHOLDER_FOR_TABLE_2]&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size="1"&gt;:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff" size="1"&gt;LOAD&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT size="1"&gt; 1 &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff" size="1"&gt;AS&lt;/FONT&gt; &lt;FONT color="#800000" size="1"&gt;ID&lt;/FONT&gt; &lt;FONT color="#0000ff" size="1"&gt;AUTOGENERATE&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size="1"&gt; (0);&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color="#008000" size="1"&gt;//** What happened to my second target table?! &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've had "clever" experiences where when auto-concatenate is in effect, a seeming innocuous later date change subtlely aligns two formerly disparate table structures into a unified one and results in&amp;nbsp;unintended auto-concatenation never meant to be such, and becomes a big headache.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Be cautious when presented with the innocent request (many months later) for &lt;EM&gt;"would itttt be hard to rename this one field from [BlaBla] to [BlablaBla]?"&lt;/EM&gt; You might be getting set-up.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 15:35:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Nocontenate-every-load/m-p/1525918#M438408</guid>
      <dc:creator>evan_kurowski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-03T15:35:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

