<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Start Schema on big data set in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Start-Schema-on-big-data-set/m-p/1617585#M445536</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;To associate the tables within a qvw you could use: autonumber(YourKeyField) as KEY. But if you need this key already before, for example for incremental approaches autonumber() might not be suitable anymore.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;An alternatively could be to replace the alpha-numeric key with a numeric ones, for example by summing/multiplying ID fields instead of string-concatenate them, for example one of my most important keys look like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;([StoreID] * pow(10, 4)) + ([OrderID]) * pow(10, 8)) + [PosID] as [UniqueKey]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Beside this the data-size in Qlik might be significantely smaller as the rawdata especially if there are only a rather low cardinality of the field-values and if not it might be worth to look if it could be optimized in that way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Marcus&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 11:38:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>marcus_sommer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-08-28T11:38:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Start Schema on big data set</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Start-Schema-on-big-data-set/m-p/1617533#M445525</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Times New Roman, serif"&gt;&lt;FONT size="3"&gt;&lt;FONT color="#3d3d3d"&gt;&lt;FONT face="Helvetica, serif"&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;I'm working on a large data set with csv file with 7-10 gb size. Now I need to combine 2(or more) files on a key field that is alphanumeric. How should I acheive this in the most optimized way?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:11:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Start-Schema-on-big-data-set/m-p/1617533#M445525</guid>
      <dc:creator>sujit_nath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-16T20:11:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Start Schema on big data set</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Start-Schema-on-big-data-set/m-p/1617585#M445536</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;To associate the tables within a qvw you could use: autonumber(YourKeyField) as KEY. But if you need this key already before, for example for incremental approaches autonumber() might not be suitable anymore.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;An alternatively could be to replace the alpha-numeric key with a numeric ones, for example by summing/multiplying ID fields instead of string-concatenate them, for example one of my most important keys look like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;([StoreID] * pow(10, 4)) + ([OrderID]) * pow(10, 8)) + [PosID] as [UniqueKey]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Beside this the data-size in Qlik might be significantely smaller as the rawdata especially if there are only a rather low cardinality of the field-values and if not it might be worth to look if it could be optimized in that way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Marcus&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 11:38:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Start-Schema-on-big-data-set/m-p/1617585#M445536</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcus_sommer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-28T11:38:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

