<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Help Re-write aggr expression - faster application in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Help-Re-write-aggr-expression-faster-application/m-p/29109#M4853</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would you be able to share a sample to test out few possibilities?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 14:06:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sunny_talwar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-01-31T14:06:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Help Re-write aggr expression - faster application</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Help-Re-write-aggr-expression-faster-application/m-p/29108#M4852</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Need help re-write this to an easier expression;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;((sum(aggr(&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sum(kWh) * sum(aggr(sum(Price), DateJoin,Pricearea,CustomerKey)) , DateJoin, Year,Month, Pricearea,portifolio,CustomerKey))&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ) / sum(kWh))*100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;as it is now, it slows down my application too mutch. Any suggestion to solve this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:50:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Help-Re-write-aggr-expression-faster-application/m-p/29108#M4852</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-31T13:50:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Help Re-write aggr expression - faster application</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Help-Re-write-aggr-expression-faster-application/m-p/29109#M4853</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would you be able to share a sample to test out few possibilities?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 14:06:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Help-Re-write-aggr-expression-faster-application/m-p/29109#M4853</guid>
      <dc:creator>sunny_talwar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-31T14:06:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Help Re-write aggr expression - faster application</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Help-Re-write-aggr-expression-faster-application/m-p/29110#M4854</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's not surprising that a nested aggr-function is slow. Are you sure that you really need it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Beside this quite often determined the datamodel how performant gui-calculations could be. Therefore a different data-structure could be quite useful - fo example to put kWh and Price within one table and avoiding the aggr-stuff. Further if your datamodel is build with link-tables I suggest to rethink the entire datamodel.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Marcus&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 16:04:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Help-Re-write-aggr-expression-faster-application/m-p/29110#M4854</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcus_sommer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-31T16:04:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

