<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Help with Document Security ?? in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Help-with-Document-Security/m-p/184220#M49202</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One of our customer has taken one document Qlikview license. That means all the reports have to be in one document.&lt;BR /&gt;This will work as long as security is not in place. When we implement security we are getting issues./ Let me explain our scenario.&lt;BR /&gt;We have some reports depends on Date , Location and Product. The some others are dependent on Date, Location, Supplier and Product.&lt;BR /&gt;We want security to be implemented depending on the Location, Product and Supplier.&lt;BR /&gt;Now For first set of reports we can implement security using username, access , Location_nam and Product_num.&lt;BR /&gt;We should be able to security for second set of reports using username, access , Location_nam , Product_num and Supplier_num.&lt;BR /&gt;That means we should be able to restrict data using two keys for first set of reports and using three keys for secod set of reports.&lt;BR /&gt;Is this possible. What I experienced is we cannot have two separate set of security . Is that fine. Also note that in the above example I cannot combine both as for first set of reports supplier will not make any sense.&lt;BR /&gt;Can you please help me on this. First question is whether something like this possible? If yes, Please let me now the solution.&lt;BR /&gt;If No is it a limitation of QV?&lt;BR /&gt;Let me attach my queries for you.&lt;BR /&gt;First report:&lt;BR /&gt;Absorption:&lt;BR /&gt;Load&lt;BR /&gt;"LOCATION_NAME",&lt;BR /&gt;"LOCATION_NUM",&lt;BR /&gt;"PRODUCT_NAME",&lt;BR /&gt;PNO,&lt;BR /&gt;"BUDGET_ABSORPTION",&lt;BR /&gt;"BUDGET_PRODUCTION";&lt;BR /&gt;SQL SELECT *&lt;BR /&gt;FROM ABSORPTION;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Second Report:&lt;BR /&gt;Purchasing:&lt;BR /&gt;Load&lt;BR /&gt;"LOCATION_NAME",&lt;BR /&gt;"LOCATION_NUM",&lt;BR /&gt;PNO,&lt;BR /&gt;"SUPPLIER_NUM",&lt;BR /&gt;PRODUCT,&lt;BR /&gt;"PURCHASE_COST",&lt;BR /&gt;"PURCHASING_COST";&lt;BR /&gt;SQL SELECT *&lt;BR /&gt;FROM PURCHASING;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Best Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mahasweta&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:31:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator />
    <dc:date>2009-12-11T16:31:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Help with Document Security ??</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Help-with-Document-Security/m-p/184220#M49202</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One of our customer has taken one document Qlikview license. That means all the reports have to be in one document.&lt;BR /&gt;This will work as long as security is not in place. When we implement security we are getting issues./ Let me explain our scenario.&lt;BR /&gt;We have some reports depends on Date , Location and Product. The some others are dependent on Date, Location, Supplier and Product.&lt;BR /&gt;We want security to be implemented depending on the Location, Product and Supplier.&lt;BR /&gt;Now For first set of reports we can implement security using username, access , Location_nam and Product_num.&lt;BR /&gt;We should be able to security for second set of reports using username, access , Location_nam , Product_num and Supplier_num.&lt;BR /&gt;That means we should be able to restrict data using two keys for first set of reports and using three keys for secod set of reports.&lt;BR /&gt;Is this possible. What I experienced is we cannot have two separate set of security . Is that fine. Also note that in the above example I cannot combine both as for first set of reports supplier will not make any sense.&lt;BR /&gt;Can you please help me on this. First question is whether something like this possible? If yes, Please let me now the solution.&lt;BR /&gt;If No is it a limitation of QV?&lt;BR /&gt;Let me attach my queries for you.&lt;BR /&gt;First report:&lt;BR /&gt;Absorption:&lt;BR /&gt;Load&lt;BR /&gt;"LOCATION_NAME",&lt;BR /&gt;"LOCATION_NUM",&lt;BR /&gt;"PRODUCT_NAME",&lt;BR /&gt;PNO,&lt;BR /&gt;"BUDGET_ABSORPTION",&lt;BR /&gt;"BUDGET_PRODUCTION";&lt;BR /&gt;SQL SELECT *&lt;BR /&gt;FROM ABSORPTION;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Second Report:&lt;BR /&gt;Purchasing:&lt;BR /&gt;Load&lt;BR /&gt;"LOCATION_NAME",&lt;BR /&gt;"LOCATION_NUM",&lt;BR /&gt;PNO,&lt;BR /&gt;"SUPPLIER_NUM",&lt;BR /&gt;PRODUCT,&lt;BR /&gt;"PURCHASE_COST",&lt;BR /&gt;"PURCHASING_COST";&lt;BR /&gt;SQL SELECT *&lt;BR /&gt;FROM PURCHASING;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Best Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mahasweta&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:31:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Help-with-Document-Security/m-p/184220#M49202</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2009-12-11T16:31:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Help with Document Security ??</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Help-with-Document-Security/m-p/184221#M49203</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any idea for the same please?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mahasweta&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:30:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Help-with-Document-Security/m-p/184221#M49203</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2009-12-11T19:30:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Help with Document Security ??</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Help-with-Document-Security/m-p/184222#M49204</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you not amalgamate the two sets of security fields and simply use '*' where the field is not appropriate?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gordon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:57:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Help-with-Document-Security/m-p/184222#M49204</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2009-12-11T19:57:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Help with Document Security ??</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Help-with-Document-Security/m-p/184223#M49205</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;WIll you please say how to do that?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It will be great if you write with the code?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a ton for your help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mahasweta&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:04:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Help-with-Document-Security/m-p/184223#M49205</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2009-12-14T16:04:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

