<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Complex data reduction (for me anyway) in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Complex-data-reduction-for-me-anyway/m-p/187208#M50986</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Following your example the Value 'A' needs to be explicitly defined for every row that you want the user to see so you need the rows to be:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1,100,A,-,-&lt;BR /&gt;1,-,A,100,A&lt;BR /&gt;2,-,A,200,B&lt;BR /&gt;3,-,A,300,C&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You could do a join of the 2 tables so that A,B and C would be defined for every value in Table 2, but this might have the heavy cost or increasing drastically the size of the table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wonder if you could just link Table 1 and Table 2 by Month and as long as value A is related to all the months you are going to still see all the values of Table 2. How does that sound?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:39:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pover</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-11-15T18:39:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Complex data reduction (for me anyway)</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Complex-data-reduction-for-me-anyway/m-p/187207#M50985</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have 2 tables which have been concatenated as follows&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Table1:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Month, Value, UNIT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1,100,A&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2,200,B&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3,300,C&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Table2:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Month, ValueA, X_UNIT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1,100,A&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2,200,B&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3,300,C&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The resulting concatenated table looks something like this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Month, Value, UNIT, ValueA, X_UNIT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1,100,A-,-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2,200,B,-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3,300,C,-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1,-,-,100,A&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2,-,-,200,B&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3,-,-,300,C&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now, I am trying to reduce data for each user by UNIT only, NOT by X_UNIT. The output that I am trying to get at is:-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If a user who belongs to UNIT A logs in, he/she should see:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Month, Value, UNIT, ValueA, X_UNIT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1,100,A-,-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1,-,-,100,A&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2,-,-,200,B&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3,-,-,300,C&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this possible?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Right now, if I reduce by UNIT, all data under X_UNIT is not available to the user.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help would be appreciated&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:41:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Complex-data-reduction-for-me-anyway/m-p/187207#M50985</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2010-11-15T10:41:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Complex data reduction (for me anyway)</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Complex-data-reduction-for-me-anyway/m-p/187208#M50986</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Following your example the Value 'A' needs to be explicitly defined for every row that you want the user to see so you need the rows to be:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1,100,A,-,-&lt;BR /&gt;1,-,A,100,A&lt;BR /&gt;2,-,A,200,B&lt;BR /&gt;3,-,A,300,C&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You could do a join of the 2 tables so that A,B and C would be defined for every value in Table 2, but this might have the heavy cost or increasing drastically the size of the table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wonder if you could just link Table 1 and Table 2 by Month and as long as value A is related to all the months you are going to still see all the values of Table 2. How does that sound?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:39:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Complex-data-reduction-for-me-anyway/m-p/187208#M50986</guid>
      <dc:creator>pover</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-15T18:39:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

