<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic implementation in a community in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/implementation-in-a-community/m-p/209767#M64635</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Summary:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Current Platform: QVS for Communities 9.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Current Document: Sales.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Description feature: Each client has its own product list, its own sales force and record sales by product.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Current Dimensions: The qvw for one single client can vary from 200 MB to 500 MB, It plans to have about 100 clients in 12 months.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question: It is preferable to have replicated the same document for each client and manage the charging process independently, or have only one document and leave the work QVPublisher distribute? if this were the case, as it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I appreciate the feedback.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:44:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator />
    <dc:date>2010-01-13T03:44:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>implementation in a community</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/implementation-in-a-community/m-p/209767#M64635</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Summary:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Current Platform: QVS for Communities 9.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Current Document: Sales.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Description feature: Each client has its own product list, its own sales force and record sales by product.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Current Dimensions: The qvw for one single client can vary from 200 MB to 500 MB, It plans to have about 100 clients in 12 months.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question: It is preferable to have replicated the same document for each client and manage the charging process independently, or have only one document and leave the work QVPublisher distribute? if this were the case, as it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I appreciate the feedback.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:44:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/implementation-in-a-community/m-p/209767#M64635</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2010-01-13T03:44:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>implementation in a community</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/implementation-in-a-community/m-p/209768#M64636</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would recommend having one document with Section Access and reduction for the different users so that they only see their own subset of the data model. Imagine having 100 different documents of 200MB a piece with all users accessing them simultaneously. That's a lot of documents to be loaded into QVS memory..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:20:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/implementation-in-a-community/m-p/209768#M64636</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-13T04:20:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

