<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Join performance: single on string or double on integers? in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Join-performance-single-on-string-or-double-on-integers/m-p/1577322#M740431</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just testing your question and I can check that the join on double integers is better than string.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I attach a .qvw file. In script editor you can test this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope it is useful for you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dan.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 11:12:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>daanciorea</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-05-07T11:12:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Join performance: single on string or double on integers?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Join-performance-single-on-string-or-double-on-integers/m-p/1577263#M740430</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am afraid this was discussed before, but unfortunately what is being discussed&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView-App-Development/String-Key-vs-Integer-Key-any-difference-in-link-performance/td-p/612652" target="_self"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView-Deployment/When-is-it-worth-to-join-a-dimension-to-the-fact-table/td-p/122511" target="_self"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt; is beyond my level of understanding.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My issue: I need to join two tables during script execution, the row count is in the millions, so any performance improvement is welcome. I currently join on a string field that is the concatenation of two integer fields, '00_12345' = '00_12345'.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since the tables also have the original fields I was wondering whether a double join on 00 = 00 and 12345 = 12345 would reduce script runtime.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Igor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:55:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Join-performance-single-on-string-or-double-on-integers/m-p/1577263#M740430</guid>
      <dc:creator>imark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-16T20:55:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Join performance: single on string or double on integers?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Join-performance-single-on-string-or-double-on-integers/m-p/1577322#M740431</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just testing your question and I can check that the join on double integers is better than string.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I attach a .qvw file. In script editor you can test this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope it is useful for you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dan.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 11:12:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Join-performance-single-on-string-or-double-on-integers/m-p/1577322#M740431</guid>
      <dc:creator>daanciorea</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-07T11:12:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

