<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Data Modeling Question in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Data-Modeling-Question/m-p/1510034#M750282</link>
    <description>1) I've never heard a special name for it.&lt;BR /&gt;2) you will not have any performance issues with it.&lt;BR /&gt;3) No need to avoid it. This design is better than a design where you duplicated this field to just to get single connections.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Good work!</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 21:04:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vegar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-11-20T21:04:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Data Modeling Question</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Data-Modeling-Question/m-p/1510027#M750281</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a model with three tables linked, but without syntetic keys. I don't know the name of this "kind" of link, cause i know it is not a syntetic or link table... Also, I wonder if this causes performance issues or not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) What is the name of this kind of link&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Does this causes any performance issues?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) Should I avoid it if possible or how should I model this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Three Table Union.png" style="width: 608px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.qlik.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/683i2CFE9B89CC079AC6/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Three Table Union.png" alt="Three Table Union.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:16:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Data-Modeling-Question/m-p/1510027#M750281</guid>
      <dc:creator>cristian_av</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-25T16:16:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data Modeling Question</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Data-Modeling-Question/m-p/1510034#M750282</link>
      <description>1) I've never heard a special name for it.&lt;BR /&gt;2) you will not have any performance issues with it.&lt;BR /&gt;3) No need to avoid it. This design is better than a design where you duplicated this field to just to get single connections.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Good work!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 21:04:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Data-Modeling-Question/m-p/1510034#M750282</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vegar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-20T21:04:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

