<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Federation protocols compliance in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Federation-protocols-compliance/m-p/1444496#M797536</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you Thirumala. SAML 2.0 seems to be the preferred solution. But I was told that OpenID could be the best option for mobile users.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 08:59:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-12-08T08:59:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Federation protocols compliance</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Federation-protocols-compliance/m-p/1444494#M797534</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In order to implement SSO, I need to check which protocol QlikView is compliant with.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These protocols could be SAML, OpenID, WS-Fed, Oauth. Any idea ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:16:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Federation-protocols-compliance/m-p/1444494#M797534</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-25T16:16:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Federation protocols compliance</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Federation-protocols-compliance/m-p/1444495#M797535</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;May be following link will be helpful:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.ssoeasy.com/partner-ready-network/qlikview-sso/" title="https://www.ssoeasy.com/partner-ready-network/qlikview-sso/"&gt;https://www.ssoeasy.com/partner-ready-network/qlikview-sso/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 19:15:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Federation-protocols-compliance/m-p/1444495#M797535</guid>
      <dc:creator>trdandamudi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-07T19:15:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Federation protocols compliance</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Federation-protocols-compliance/m-p/1444496#M797536</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you Thirumala. SAML 2.0 seems to be the preferred solution. But I was told that OpenID could be the best option for mobile users.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 08:59:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Federation-protocols-compliance/m-p/1444496#M797536</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-08T08:59:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

