<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Multiple Fact Tables Sharing Common and Different Dimensions in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Multiple-Fact-Tables-Sharing-Common-and-Different-Dimensions/m-p/1379145#M810714</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would probably concatenate all four fact tables into one long table. This would result in a solution that is more efficient than one with a link table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HIC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 05:52:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>hic</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-10-03T05:52:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple Fact Tables Sharing Common and Different Dimensions</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Multiple-Fact-Tables-Sharing-Common-and-Different-Dimensions/m-p/1379143#M810712</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi QlikView Experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am stuck in the data modelling process. I have four fact tables. All share the same two dimensions (e.g. Dim1 and Dim2).&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Moreover two fact tables share two dimensions (e.g. Dim3 and Dim4) which doesn't exist in the other two fact tables.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Following the two approaches I've tested. The first one works (because I want to do a selection for "Special_ID" in Fact1) but QlikView creates a synthetic key and I don't know how to avoid this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the second approach I've used generic keys, but can't do selections for the "Special_ID" :-(.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should I live with the synthetic key from the first approach or do you have any ideas how best to solve this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="Bildschirmfoto 2017-10-02 um 17.25.47.png" class="jive-image image-1" src="/legacyfs/online/178299_Bildschirmfoto 2017-10-02 um 17.25.47.png" style="height: 375px; width: 620px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="Bildschirmfoto 2017-10-02 um 17.33.25.png" class="jive-image image-2" src="/legacyfs/online/178300_Bildschirmfoto 2017-10-02 um 17.33.25.png" style="height: 554px; width: 620px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:16:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Multiple-Fact-Tables-Sharing-Common-and-Different-Dimensions/m-p/1379143#M810712</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2020-11-25T16:16:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple Fact Tables Sharing Common and Different Dimensions</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Multiple-Fact-Tables-Sharing-Common-and-Different-Dimensions/m-p/1379144#M810713</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sven,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You may want to check out a couple of articles written by &lt;A href="https://community.qlik.com/qlik-users/4003"&gt;hic&lt;/A&gt;‌.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.qlik.com/qlik-blogpost/2819"&gt;Fact Table with Mixed Granularity&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.qlik.com/docs/DOC-3451"&gt;Generic keys&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good luck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Oscar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2017 17:45:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Multiple-Fact-Tables-Sharing-Common-and-Different-Dimensions/m-p/1379144#M810713</guid>
      <dc:creator>oscar_ortiz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-02T17:45:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple Fact Tables Sharing Common and Different Dimensions</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Multiple-Fact-Tables-Sharing-Common-and-Different-Dimensions/m-p/1379145#M810714</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would probably concatenate all four fact tables into one long table. This would result in a solution that is more efficient than one with a link table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HIC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 05:52:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Multiple-Fact-Tables-Sharing-Common-and-Different-Dimensions/m-p/1379145#M810714</guid>
      <dc:creator>hic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-03T05:52:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple Fact Tables Sharing Common and Different Dimensions</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Multiple-Fact-Tables-Sharing-Common-and-Different-Dimensions/m-p/1379146#M810715</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you both for your responses,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but after concatenating the tables some of my calculations within the diagramms don't work anymore ;-(.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sven&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 20:48:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Multiple-Fact-Tables-Sharing-Common-and-Different-Dimensions/m-p/1379146#M810715</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2017-10-06T20:48:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple Fact Tables Sharing Common and Different Dimensions</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Multiple-Fact-Tables-Sharing-Common-and-Different-Dimensions/m-p/1798063#M1211439</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So can we say that link table architecture is a Star Schema ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 15:56:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Multiple-Fact-Tables-Sharing-Common-and-Different-Dimensions/m-p/1798063#M1211439</guid>
      <dc:creator>Shubham_D</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-08T15:56:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

