<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Partial Reload for Incremental Load? in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Partial-Reload-for-Incremental-Load/m-p/1334680#M822010</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Coming from a performance perspective: my data refresh is a 3 stage process:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. ODI ETL from a transactional DB to an Enterprise Data Warehouse (EDW)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. QVW to extract tables from EDW into QVDs. This is an incremental load&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. QVW to read from QVDs. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For stage 3, I am currently using a default full load to load the QVDs into the QVW. It will do this full load every hour.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am wondering if there are performance benefits to using a partial reload to ADD new records from the QVD, and REPLACE updated records. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anybody know if there are substantial performance improvements, if it is even possible? Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sincerely,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kerk&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:16:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kerkying</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-11-25T16:16:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Partial Reload for Incremental Load?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Partial-Reload-for-Incremental-Load/m-p/1334680#M822010</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Coming from a performance perspective: my data refresh is a 3 stage process:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. ODI ETL from a transactional DB to an Enterprise Data Warehouse (EDW)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. QVW to extract tables from EDW into QVDs. This is an incremental load&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. QVW to read from QVDs. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For stage 3, I am currently using a default full load to load the QVDs into the QVW. It will do this full load every hour.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am wondering if there are performance benefits to using a partial reload to ADD new records from the QVD, and REPLACE updated records. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anybody know if there are substantial performance improvements, if it is even possible? Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sincerely,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kerk&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:16:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Partial-Reload-for-Incremental-Load/m-p/1334680#M822010</guid>
      <dc:creator>kerkying</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-25T16:16:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Partial Reload for Incremental Load?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Partial-Reload-for-Incremental-Load/m-p/1334681#M822011</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't think so whether performs improve for this case because even you are doing Partial Reload by using ADD / REPLACE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But, as per my experience if you use either one of ADD / REPLACE off course, You may get saves the time to reload.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 11:42:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Partial-Reload-for-Incremental-Load/m-p/1334681#M822011</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anil_Babu_Samineni</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-02T11:42:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

