<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Data Modeling in Qlikview - Star Schema vs Snowflake in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Data-Modeling-in-Qlikview-Star-Schema-vs-Snowflake/m-p/50727#M8391</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes Petter, I agree with you. With the way QV stores the data there wont be much difference in terms of Memory Saved.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My Problem here is Unnecessary processing to have the normalized tables in QV. I want to avoid it and bring the tables as they are in DB (only With required transformations) .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't see any advantage with his recommendations.&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;I am trying to understand if there is advantage with Snowflake over Star.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 16:09:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-04-04T16:09:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Data Modeling in Qlikview - Star Schema vs Snowflake</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Data-Modeling-in-Qlikview-Star-Schema-vs-Snowflake/m-p/50723#M8387</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a confusion in choosing the Data Model Schema for my project. Can you guys please guide me choosing the right Schema?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In General , when do we Choose Star Schema over Snowflake and vice versa??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 07:29:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Data-Modeling-in-Qlikview-Star-Schema-vs-Snowflake/m-p/50723#M8387</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-04T07:29:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data Modeling in Qlikview - Star Schema vs Snowflake</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Data-Modeling-in-Qlikview-Star-Schema-vs-Snowflake/m-p/50724#M8388</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Snowflake is just extending a Star Schema. When it comes to Qlik it seldom makes any difference speedwise unless you have a lot of rows in your dimension tables. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The associative engine in Qlik works equally well for both types.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 15:31:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Data-Modeling-in-Qlikview-Star-Schema-vs-Snowflake/m-p/50724#M8388</guid>
      <dc:creator>petter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-04T15:31:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data Modeling in Qlikview - Star Schema vs Snowflake</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Data-Modeling-in-Qlikview-Star-Schema-vs-Snowflake/m-p/50725#M8389</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your Answer Petter.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Generally when we are working with any Traditional BI tool People prefer to work with STAR Schema over Snowflake.Reason they give -- Less Joins --&amp;gt;Better&amp;nbsp; Performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My Situation:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Case 1: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;6 Dimension Tables (Denormalized) and 1 Fact table ---&amp;gt; My Architect recommended to Normalize the dimensional tables before loading into QV , So that we can have snowflake schema in the data model.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Case 2: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;8 Dimensions &amp;amp; 2 facts:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Similar Recommendations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't understand&amp;nbsp; why he is asking me to Normalize the dimensions .I did ask him about this but didn't get any answer. &lt;IMG src="https://community.qlik.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/sad.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 15:50:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Data-Modeling-in-Qlikview-Star-Schema-vs-Snowflake/m-p/50725#M8389</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-04T15:50:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data Modeling in Qlikview - Star Schema vs Snowflake</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Data-Modeling-in-Qlikview-Star-Schema-vs-Snowflake/m-p/50726#M8390</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Qlik will work functionally similar with both normalized and denormalized dimension tables. Due to compression algorithms in Qlik when it comes to in-memory tables there is little if anything to save of memory by normalizing. So I wouldn't worry too much either way unless normalizing leads to a lot of small tables being created.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Qlik the "Less Joins -&amp;gt; Better Perfomance" translates to "Less associations -&amp;gt; Better Performance" although practical tests done by experts have shown that there is little performance loss with snowflake models in most cases.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 16:02:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Data-Modeling-in-Qlikview-Star-Schema-vs-Snowflake/m-p/50726#M8390</guid>
      <dc:creator>petter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-04T16:02:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data Modeling in Qlikview - Star Schema vs Snowflake</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Data-Modeling-in-Qlikview-Star-Schema-vs-Snowflake/m-p/50727#M8391</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes Petter, I agree with you. With the way QV stores the data there wont be much difference in terms of Memory Saved.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My Problem here is Unnecessary processing to have the normalized tables in QV. I want to avoid it and bring the tables as they are in DB (only With required transformations) .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't see any advantage with his recommendations.&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;I am trying to understand if there is advantage with Snowflake over Star.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 16:09:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Data-Modeling-in-Qlikview-Star-Schema-vs-Snowflake/m-p/50727#M8391</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-04T16:09:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

