<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Using set analysis in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Using-set-analysis/m-p/1065363#M937177</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hey guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From the attached document, I am trying to determine the "Yearvolume" for &lt;STRONG&gt;gas&lt;/STRONG&gt; and &lt;STRONG&gt;electra&lt;/STRONG&gt; separately.I have tried these set analysis below &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;='electra volume : ' &amp;amp;num(sum({&amp;lt;EnergyType = {"gas"},EnergyTypeID = {54}&amp;gt;}YearVolume). But all I keep getting as the output is the sum total of all the different energy type for that particular locationID. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't what I am missing out. Any help with how the tables need to be connected and determining the expected results will be really appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Simon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:19:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator />
    <dc:date>2016-02-18T14:19:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Using set analysis</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Using-set-analysis/m-p/1065363#M937177</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hey guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From the attached document, I am trying to determine the "Yearvolume" for &lt;STRONG&gt;gas&lt;/STRONG&gt; and &lt;STRONG&gt;electra&lt;/STRONG&gt; separately.I have tried these set analysis below &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;='electra volume : ' &amp;amp;num(sum({&amp;lt;EnergyType = {"gas"},EnergyTypeID = {54}&amp;gt;}YearVolume). But all I keep getting as the output is the sum total of all the different energy type for that particular locationID. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't what I am missing out. Any help with how the tables need to be connected and determining the expected results will be really appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Simon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:19:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Using-set-analysis/m-p/1065363#M937177</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2016-02-18T14:19:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using set analysis</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Using-set-analysis/m-p/1065364#M937178</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Simon,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;your Set Analysis formula looks correct. Well, almost - you don't need the double quotes unless you need to search for a wildcard.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think the problem is in your data set. The Meter Volumes are not linked to Energy Types because the ID field has two different names - SystemID in one table and EnergyTypeID in another table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you rename one of the two fields to match the other one, your data will be associated and everything will magically work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Oleg Troyansky&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Upgrade your Qlik skills at the &lt;A href="http://masterssummit.com/"&gt;Masters Summit for Qlik&lt;/A&gt; - coming soon to Milan, Italy and Austin, TX!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:01:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Using-set-analysis/m-p/1065364#M937178</guid>
      <dc:creator>Oleg_Troyansky</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-18T18:01:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

