<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Help needed on data modelling in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Help-needed-on-data-modelling/m-p/248268#M94507</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;One thing that comes to mind - keep the concatenation and add PRODUCTGROUP directly to the fact table (use mapping), then drop it from ITEM table. This would get rid of synthetic key.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:50:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kuba_michalik</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-02T14:50:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Help needed on data modelling</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Help-needed-on-data-modelling/m-p/248266#M94505</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm stuck with this case:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Table: TRANSACTIONS with link to tables CUSTOMER&amp;nbsp; and ITEM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As you would expect this holds the sales data&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now I want to add the budgets. The budgets are per CUSTOMER and PRODUCTGROUP. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PRODUCTGROUP is 1 level higher then ITEM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've tried:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- ad the budget table and link to ITEM.PRODUCTGROUP and to CUSTOMER.ID &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; this gives a circulair reference (loop)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- concatenating the budget table to the TRANSACTIONS table&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; this gives a synthetic key as the fields PRODUCTGROUP&amp;nbsp; and ITEM.ID both exist in the ITEM table as in the TRANSACTIONS table&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope to find an idea here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Johan.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:43:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Help-needed-on-data-modelling/m-p/248266#M94505</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2012-02-02T14:43:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Help needed on data modelling</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Help-needed-on-data-modelling/m-p/248267#M94506</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One idea can be to create a link table and then connect Customers/Items/Budgets with Transactions using this link table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Help-needed-on-data-modelling/m-p/248267#M94506</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2012-02-02T14:49:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Help needed on data modelling</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Help-needed-on-data-modelling/m-p/248268#M94507</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;One thing that comes to mind - keep the concatenation and add PRODUCTGROUP directly to the fact table (use mapping), then drop it from ITEM table. This would get rid of synthetic key.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:50:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Help-needed-on-data-modelling/m-p/248268#M94507</guid>
      <dc:creator>kuba_michalik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-02T14:50:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Help needed on data modelling</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Help-needed-on-data-modelling/m-p/248269#M94508</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the quick responses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Meanwhile I've concatenated the the list of PRODUCTGROUP's to the ITEM table as ITEM.ID. Now both the TRANSACTIONS&amp;nbsp; as the (concatenated) budget lines link to ITEM.ID. That seams to work, just need to test the results.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But Kuba's method is probably better, when my test fails, I'm gonna try that. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not familiar with Linked tables. Maybe I should &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Johan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:35:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Help-needed-on-data-modelling/m-p/248269#M94508</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2012-02-02T15:35:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

