<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Qlikview 11 - x86 or 64 ? in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Qlikview-11-x86-or-64/m-p/251633#M95446</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The biggest difference is the amount of RAM that can be used. If you are not using 64-bit you are going to be severly limited.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa366778(v=vs.85).aspx"&gt;http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa366778(v=vs.85).aspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:57:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-03T15:57:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Qlikview 11 - x86 or 64 ?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Qlikview-11-x86-or-64/m-p/251631#M95444</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Im currently considering an update to QV11. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While comparing v9.0 to v11, there are some improvements (bugs of 9 and especcialy 10 resolved, some new bugs).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;v11 now uses hyperthreading properly&amp;nbsp; on the dev machines, so its a bit faster than v9.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there some differences between the x86 and the 64 bit version of QV11 ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the past, there occured some major problems (straight failures, wrong results, inaccuracys etc.) when using certain expressions on 64bit versions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your Feedback in Advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alex&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:17:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Qlikview-11-x86-or-64/m-p/251631#M95444</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2012-02-03T12:17:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Qlikview 11 - x86 or 64 ?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Qlikview-11-x86-or-64/m-p/251632#M95445</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;there's no different beside of the architecture(x86 or x64) it self. I can tell you this because I also using QlikView for a long time since version 7.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;V11 offers some new great features.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:48:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Qlikview-11-x86-or-64/m-p/251632#M95445</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2012-02-03T15:48:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Qlikview 11 - x86 or 64 ?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Qlikview-11-x86-or-64/m-p/251633#M95446</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The biggest difference is the amount of RAM that can be used. If you are not using 64-bit you are going to be severly limited.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa366778(v=vs.85).aspx"&gt;http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa366778(v=vs.85).aspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:57:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Qlikview-11-x86-or-64/m-p/251633#M95446</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-03T15:57:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Qlikview 11 - x86 or 64 ?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Qlikview-11-x86-or-64/m-p/251634#M95447</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;at the moment, QV 9/11 x86 is running on Windows7 64bit Machines.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;@bgarland, thanks for the link&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was not aware, that the 32bit programs could not use the whole ram which is provided by win7 64.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;32bit software on x64 OS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4 (2) &lt;STRONG&gt;GB&lt;/STRONG&gt; with IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWARE &lt;STRONG&gt;set&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;8 &lt;STRONG&gt;TB&lt;/STRONG&gt; IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWARE &lt;STRONG&gt;set&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so, it will be QV11 x64 this time. but i will compare them (32 and 64) closely to make shure there are no bugs in the 64 Version (like in 10 and especially in 9).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:24:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Qlikview-11-x86-or-64/m-p/251634#M95447</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2012-02-03T16:24:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

