<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Set Analysis in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Set-Analysis/m-p/259320#M97895</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perfect. That's what I suspected as my formula did work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Miguel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:43:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator />
    <dc:date>2011-11-28T10:43:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Set Analysis</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Set-Analysis/m-p/259317#M97892</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can someone please tell me why Qlikview doesn't recognize the -= function in a set analysis? It is always underlined in red as if there's an error?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:19:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Set-Analysis/m-p/259317#M97892</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2011-11-28T10:19:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Set Analysis</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Set-Analysis/m-p/259318#M97893</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;QlikView actually recognizes the -= operator. It's a known issue in the editor that underlines in red as an error, but just that. Your expression will work just fine using the -= operator in set analysis.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Miguel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:38:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Set-Analysis/m-p/259318#M97893</guid>
      <dc:creator>Miguel_Angel_Baeyens</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-28T10:38:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Set Analysis</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Set-Analysis/m-p/259319#M97894</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perfect. That's what I suspected as my formula did work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Miguel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:42:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Set-Analysis/m-p/259319#M97894</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2011-11-28T10:42:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Set Analysis</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Set-Analysis/m-p/259320#M97895</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perfect. That's what I suspected as my formula did work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Miguel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:43:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Set-Analysis/m-p/259320#M97895</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2011-11-28T10:43:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

