<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: star and snow in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/star-and-snow/m-p/932457#M981908</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both will work faster.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 23:09:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>qlikviewwizard</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-08-17T23:09:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>star and snow</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/star-and-snow/m-p/932450#M981901</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; I have tables and i just loaded into with and i created data model with out using any joins.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; here my doubt is which schema is faster i.e star or snow with out using any joins between the tables &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2015 06:32:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/star-and-snow/m-p/932450#M981901</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2015-08-16T06:32:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: star and snow</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/star-and-snow/m-p/932451#M981902</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In general, less hops between tables needed to aggregate field values in expressions are performing better.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But there might be other aspects to think about, like memory consumption.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a look at this presentation for an introduction:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.qlik.com/docs/DOC-7343"&gt;Best Practices in Data Modeling.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2015 20:48:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/star-and-snow/m-p/932451#M981902</guid>
      <dc:creator>swuehl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-16T20:48:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: star and snow</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/star-and-snow/m-p/932452#M981903</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Please check the following links:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.qlik.com/message/692239"&gt;Re: Star &amp;amp;amp; snowflake schema&lt;/A&gt;‌&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.qlik.com/message/611748"&gt;Re: WHat is star and snowflake schema?? ANd which is better regarding performance point of view. ??&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this will help you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 03:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/star-and-snow/m-p/932452#M981903</guid>
      <dc:creator>qlikviewwizard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-17T03:55:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: star and snow</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/star-and-snow/m-p/932453#M981904</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Star Schema is the best, because there will be less number of joins involved.&amp;nbsp; Check below links&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.qlik.com/message/542932"&gt;Re: Re: Star schema or snowflake schema or flat file?&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="Star.png" class="jive-image image-1" src="https://community.qlik.com/legacyfs/online/96206_Star.png" style="height: 363px; width: 620px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 04:15:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/star-and-snow/m-p/932453#M981904</guid>
      <dc:creator>jagan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-17T04:15:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: star and snow</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/star-and-snow/m-p/932454#M981905</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Star Schema is the best option for your data model. Performance wise comparing to snow flake, Star schema is best.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 05:35:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/star-and-snow/m-p/932454#M981905</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-17T05:35:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: star and snow</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/star-and-snow/m-p/932455#M981906</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please go through this link:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.qlik.com/thread/102887"&gt;Star Schema or Snow Flaxe schema?&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope it will help!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 05:40:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/star-and-snow/m-p/932455#M981906</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-17T05:40:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: star and snow</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/star-and-snow/m-p/932456#M981907</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; In my case I have three tables one fact and 2 dimenstion.the fact is connected to 2 dimenstion tables that is star.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;another situation fact is connected to dimention and that dimention is connected to other dimention that is snow schma.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here i didn't used any joins.in this situation which one faster.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:45:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/star-and-snow/m-p/932456#M981907</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2015-08-17T17:45:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: star and snow</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/star-and-snow/m-p/932457#M981908</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both will work faster.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 23:09:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/star-and-snow/m-p/932457#M981908</guid>
      <dc:creator>qlikviewwizard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-17T23:09:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: star and snow</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/star-and-snow/m-p/932458#M981909</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you please attach your sample files?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 23:10:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/star-and-snow/m-p/932458#M981909</guid>
      <dc:creator>qlikviewwizard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-17T23:10:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: star and snow</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/star-and-snow/m-p/932459#M981910</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have 2 or more dimension tables joining to link to Fact table, snowflake is what you're "forced" to implement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my experience, there is&amp;nbsp; negligible performance differences, though "best practice" suggests Star is best, it's sometimes unavoidable to use a snowflake schema. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 05:28:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/star-and-snow/m-p/932459#M981910</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2015-08-18T05:28:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: star and snow</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/star-and-snow/m-p/932460#M981911</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Star is best for Data model. &lt;IMG alt="DATAMODE.png" class="jive-image image-1" src="https://community.qlik.com/legacyfs/online/96297_DATAMODE.png" style="height: 349px; width: 620px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 05:44:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/star-and-snow/m-p/932460#M981911</guid>
      <dc:creator>alibd225</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-18T05:44:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

