Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
Hi everyone,
I know that Qlik somewhat recently fixed the single versus double quote issue in set analysis so that single quotes reference literal strings while double quotes not act as a case insensitive search. This is wonderful, but I seem to have found an issue with how it was implemented. Can someone else please confirm that they are also experiencing the issue I describe below in Qlik versions starting with November 2017? I'm not sure how to send this to Qlik as a potential bug so posting here first.
My issue seems to be two-fold.
1.) You can no longer use single quotes in set analysis to filter for field values that are stored as Dual() values.
2.) Since you can't filter Dual() text values using single quotes there would be no way to distinguish between these two values in set analysis without knowing/referencing their individual number values - Dual('value', 1) and Dual('VALUE', 2).
I've attached a simple QVF file and screenshot that shows where these issues occur.
For pretty much all of our needs, switching the existing single quotes for double quotes works, but I'd like to be able to implement set analysis for Dual() values in the same way that we do for all other data types.
Best regards,
Justin
Having looked at it briefly, I'd say it's a bug. It should compare the string with the textual value of the dual, but for some reason there is no match.
Meanwhile, I suggest you use Marcus' work-around. It should work.
HIC
hi
this might helps Quotes in Set Analysis
Thanks for the information. What Henric describes in your link is what I mentioned in my first paragraph. I know and understand the updates that were made, but in his post there is no reference to how the fix affected Dual() values.
It seems as though the fix to make single/double quotes work properly has possibly created another bug when you're doing set analysis with Dual() values.
I'm not sure if I would call it a bug especially because I'm don't on the current releases and couldn't test this behaviour. But I think you could bypass your problem by using a search-expression for it like:
... Field = {"=match(Field, 'Value')"} ...
- Marcus
I will take a look at it.
HIC
Hi Marcus,
Writing the formula as you described does indeed work. Thank you for the workaround for those who need it!
I'll wait to see if Qlik/Henric can provide an update as to whether it should be required to treat Dual() values in a different way or if there can be an update/fix that will allow Dual() values to work as normal text values do.
Best regards,
Justin
Thank you very much, Henric!
Having looked at it briefly, I'd say it's a bug. It should compare the string with the textual value of the dual, but for some reason there is no match.
Meanwhile, I suggest you use Marcus' work-around. It should work.
HIC
Perfect, thanks for the confirmation, Henric! Can't wait to see the fix in some future update!
FYI, I ran across this issue at a customer today. Would be interested to know if it has been filed as a bug.
-Rob