Skip to main content
Announcements
Qlik Connect 2024! Seize endless possibilities! LEARN MORE
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
rohitk1609
Master
Master

How Qlik Sense is better than Looker

Hi Techies,

Can anyone tell me in detail with facts how Qlik Sense is better than Looker BI tool ?

 

Thanks,

Rohit

Labels (1)
1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
mr_novice
Creator II
Creator II

Hi,

I'm (or was) a qlikview developer but have been working with Looker the last year.

I think you need to realize that Looker works differently. Looker does not store any data. It's like an SQL editor with visualization where you may model your data and distribute the model between different dashboards, objects etc. All of these reachable through an API so you can let external/internal apps connect through rest-api to fetch data that you already modelled. The models are converted to SQL when you run a dashboard, graph, query...This "semantic layer" is created with "Look ML" that is very simple to use.

If you want, Looker may also cache the results of each query you run to display results faster next time. The models created can be extended, imported and/or browsed by users and developers in other projects. Users can drag/drop dimensions and measures and create their own calculations. All of these are translated to sql by looker using the models created.

My comments below.

Three things I found best in Qlik Sense than Looker:
1. Better way of connecting to data sources in Qlik than looker. Looker is based on API connectivity mostly or its very complex to connect looker to like MSQL, needs SSL SSH tunnel which are complex.

1.1 Looker connects to a lot of different databases such as MSSQL, BigQuery, etc Havent needed to use ssl or SSH yet but then I have only worked with cloud based solutions like azure dw, snowflake, bigquery.


2. Qlik ETL is powerful and can solve complex use cases especially create missing data which is not available like master calendar creates such date records which are not present in data.
Looker has ETL but not so much powerful and no capability to view data model architecture.

2.1 Anything you can do in SQL, you can do in Looker and even more. You may also let Looker schedule and run your queries and save the result back to the source database which lets you create some form of transformation. Looker lets the source database do the heavy lifting. Calendars can be created in SQL so no problems there. And yes, you may see the model architecture but not in a nice "star schema" as in Qlik. Looker scaffolds the code it needs to help you out too.


3. Variety of charts, 3rd party extension comes in Qlik but I am not sure looker has also 3rd party extension cap

3.1 Looker have 3rd party extensions and "blocks" which are like dashboards, models, connections all together. 


4. looker is cloud based, not sure how it deals with load balancing.

4.1 Looker is cloud based on AWS or GCP. On-premise version is available as well. Load balancing? this is taken care of by Looker on the platform you use. No need to worry about the infrastructure, its "under the hood" at least on the standard cloud version.


5. Looker is good with API data sources.

5.1 Yes and Lookers rest-api is nice to use. 


6. Not much tutorial content is available for free on internet

6.1 Their website have a lot of information and I think you must register (free) to access all tutorials.

 

Any way, I think there's no "best" tool to do it all. If you compare feature by feature Qlik will be better I think but Qlik have like 20 years of "lead" right?  It all depends on what the customer needs to do with the BI-tool. What infrastructure they have, if they're using cloud DW or not. Looker is doing great stuff and growing fast so there's more to come!

View solution in original post

12 Replies
miguelbraga
Partner - Specialist III
Partner - Specialist III

Hi there,

 

I don't even recall to hear from Looker BI tool. It's so unpopular that it doesn't appear in Gartner Magic Quadrant BI in February 2018. So my view about this subject is limited and based on this picture:high-res.jpg

I assume that Looker BI is weaker, but I'll investigate more about this.

 

Best regards,

MB

Ivan_Bozov
Luminary
Luminary

Looker appears as a leader in a couple of G2 Crowd  quadrants. They are similar to the Gartner magic quadrant but based on reviews from the user community. Not sure how accurate they are as Qlik is not even present in the quadrants for Data Visualization Software or Embedded Business Intelligence Software.

Anyway, I have not worked with the tool, but there are some videos online that you can check, e.g. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytHf3nq_LCY or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hvw44QNTgRc

To me it looks like that you need to use filters and the graphs (tiles) are not connected to each other (at least not by default) which would limit the data exploration capabilities (see the second video, 1:33). The associative engine and the possibility to make multiple selections are main strengths of Qlik and it appears that Looker is missing these functionalities.

vizmind.eu
rohitk1609
Master
Master
Author

I do agree with you but when I read this Gartner article, it makes me confuse
https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/analytics-business-intelligence-platforms/compare/looker-vs-q...

I do believe Qlik has best QIX engine. ETL and powerful set analysis for creating measures but I am trying to gathering facts to prove is Qlik is best than looker

Please share your inputs.
Thanks,
Rohit
rohitk1609
Master
Master
Author

I saw these URLs before, no facts just rating on names.
rohitk1609
Master
Master
Author

Three things I found best in Qlik Sense than Looker:
1. Better way of connecting to data sources in Qlik than looker. Looker is based on API connectivity mostly or its very complex to connect looker to like MSQL, needs SSL SSH tunnel which are complex.
2. Qlik ETL is powerful and can solve complex use cases especially create missing data which is not available like master calendar creates such date records which are not present in data.
Looker has ETL but not so much powerful and no capability to view data model architecture.
3. Variety of charts, 3rd party extension comes in Qlik but I am not sure looker has also 3rd party extension cap
4. looker is cloud based, not sure how it deals with load balancing.
5. Looker is good with API data sources.
6. Not much tutorial content is available for free on internet

These are my analysis till now, Can you please add your inputs ?

Thanks,
Rohit
mr_novice
Creator II
Creator II

Hi,

I'm (or was) a qlikview developer but have been working with Looker the last year.

I think you need to realize that Looker works differently. Looker does not store any data. It's like an SQL editor with visualization where you may model your data and distribute the model between different dashboards, objects etc. All of these reachable through an API so you can let external/internal apps connect through rest-api to fetch data that you already modelled. The models are converted to SQL when you run a dashboard, graph, query...This "semantic layer" is created with "Look ML" that is very simple to use.

If you want, Looker may also cache the results of each query you run to display results faster next time. The models created can be extended, imported and/or browsed by users and developers in other projects. Users can drag/drop dimensions and measures and create their own calculations. All of these are translated to sql by looker using the models created.

My comments below.

Three things I found best in Qlik Sense than Looker:
1. Better way of connecting to data sources in Qlik than looker. Looker is based on API connectivity mostly or its very complex to connect looker to like MSQL, needs SSL SSH tunnel which are complex.

1.1 Looker connects to a lot of different databases such as MSSQL, BigQuery, etc Havent needed to use ssl or SSH yet but then I have only worked with cloud based solutions like azure dw, snowflake, bigquery.


2. Qlik ETL is powerful and can solve complex use cases especially create missing data which is not available like master calendar creates such date records which are not present in data.
Looker has ETL but not so much powerful and no capability to view data model architecture.

2.1 Anything you can do in SQL, you can do in Looker and even more. You may also let Looker schedule and run your queries and save the result back to the source database which lets you create some form of transformation. Looker lets the source database do the heavy lifting. Calendars can be created in SQL so no problems there. And yes, you may see the model architecture but not in a nice "star schema" as in Qlik. Looker scaffolds the code it needs to help you out too.


3. Variety of charts, 3rd party extension comes in Qlik but I am not sure looker has also 3rd party extension cap

3.1 Looker have 3rd party extensions and "blocks" which are like dashboards, models, connections all together. 


4. looker is cloud based, not sure how it deals with load balancing.

4.1 Looker is cloud based on AWS or GCP. On-premise version is available as well. Load balancing? this is taken care of by Looker on the platform you use. No need to worry about the infrastructure, its "under the hood" at least on the standard cloud version.


5. Looker is good with API data sources.

5.1 Yes and Lookers rest-api is nice to use. 


6. Not much tutorial content is available for free on internet

6.1 Their website have a lot of information and I think you must register (free) to access all tutorials.

 

Any way, I think there's no "best" tool to do it all. If you compare feature by feature Qlik will be better I think but Qlik have like 20 years of "lead" right?  It all depends on what the customer needs to do with the BI-tool. What infrastructure they have, if they're using cloud DW or not. Looker is doing great stuff and growing fast so there's more to come!

adias102
Contributor III
Contributor III

Hi All, 

2 years later, when comparing Qlik sense vs Looker, do you have any new insights?

Thank you

rohitk1609
Master
Master
Author

I can add few more points by my experience:

1. Qlik has its own scripting language which has great function which are not available in other tools. You just need to learn Qlik scripting once and use it with data. On other side, Looker connects with DB and you have to learn your connected DB language. So it means, if you are working on three different DB, then you have to know how to do one use case with three different syntax and Symantec. 

2. In Looker, you write code with that typical DB languages which people used to work years ago.  Qlik is static in scripting, not easy to learn but once you learn you don't need to struggle every time with new DB.

3. Looker is a Cloud base tool, where you can't store any temp data for example meta or mapping data. You need new tables in source DB if you want to say some mapping or meta information. Here in Qlik, you can save data on drive and use it in your script.

4. Qlik Enterprise, you can extract and save data and use it as much times you want but here Looker charges for each query for example Looker with BQ. Bigquery is best with Looker because both products owned by Google.

5. In Qlik if you want to do aggregate on aggregation then you just need to use AGGR function but in Looker you have to write dervied table which takes hours.

There are so many examples I can share but long story short, You know Qlik, you don't need to mess with new things but in Looker you have to deal with basic sytanx and Symantec every time with new DB.  

 

If a post helps to resolve your issue, please mark the appropriate replies as "Accept as Solution" or Like it.

Reach out to me at kumar.rohit1609@gmail.com if there is need of any clarification or assistance

Connect with me on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rohit-kumar-67ba152b/

To get latest updates and articles, join Qlik community at https://www.facebook.com/QlikIntellectuals

Best,
Rohit