Skip to main content
Announcements
Have questions about Qlik Connect? Join us live on April 10th, at 11 AM ET: SIGN UP NOW
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
chanin7893
Partner - Contributor III
Partner - Contributor III

Nested Aggregation Function

Hello All,

I want the correct expression containing the AGGR Function for the given query.

Tried a few things but it didn't work out.

I'm posting the example below.

Sum[Count( Distinct (mobilecode))/Count(Distinct (routecode))]


Where mobilecode and routecode are field names.


Thanks In Advance.

11 Replies
Not applicable

Hi Chanin,

Please use the below code

Sum(Aggr((Sum([mobilecode])),[routecode]))

Regards,

Rajesh R. S.

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi,

Assuming that you are counting the number of mobile codes in given routecode.

Below is the AGGR function.

=Aggr(count(DISTINCT mobilecode),routecode)

MK_QSL
MVP
MVP

SUM(Aggr(COUNT(Distinct mobilecode)/COUNT(Distinct routecode),YourDimensionField1,YourDimensionField2))


or


Avg(Aggr(COUNT(Distinct mobilecode)/COUNT(Distinct routecode),YourDimensionField1,YourDimensionField2))

petter
Partner - Champion III
Partner - Champion III

Normally an expression like this would be the right one:

Sum( Aggr( Count(DISTINCT mobilecode) / Count(DISTINCT routecode) , <DIM1> [, <DIM2 , ... ]) )

<DIM1> is a field that is the first grouping level.

[<DIM2>, ....] is an optional list of one or more grouping levels you need or want.

Whether this will work in the context you intend to use it is hard for me to say.

The thing that Aggr introduce is that you aggregate over one or more dimension....

So it is a grouping level you have to select for the Aggr function to work. The result of an Aggr might be 0 or more values. That's why you have to do an aggregation afterwards to be sure that you can display or present the results of the Aggr.

marcus_sommer

Try:

Sum(aggr(Count( Distinct (mobilecode))/Count(Distinct (routecode)), Dim1, Dim2))

whereby Dim1, Dim2 are the dimensions in your chart respectively those dimensions against the calculation should be run.

- Marcus

chanin7893
Partner - Contributor III
Partner - Contributor III
Author

Thnks for the reply

What to add in the dimension fields . I'm a bit confused in that ??

chanin7893
Partner - Contributor III
Partner - Contributor III
Author

so can this be answered without using the AGGR function ? If yes could you please post the answer .

MK_QSL
MVP
MVP

Where are you using this expression? In chart or straight table?

You need to use those Dimensions here !

chanin7893
Partner - Contributor III
Partner - Contributor III
Author

So can the answer be found out without using the AGGR function? If yes could you please post the answer .