Qlik Community

New to Qlik Sense

Discussion board where members can get started with Qlik Sense.

Announcements
Please visit COVID-19 group to keep up the discussion. GO TO GROUP
Highlighted
Partner
Partner

System requirements tool

Hello. I'm looking for a tool that I have used in the past that allows me to know the hardware requirements depending on the product version, number of users and platform type. Is this still available? Could you let me the link?

I know there is the following resource on Qlik Help that is not the one I am looking for, the one I need is an interactive tool

https://help.qlik.com/en-US/sense/February2019/Subsystems/PlanningQlikSenseDeployments/Content/Sense...

Thanks

1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
Highlighted
Partner
Partner

Re: System requirements tool

I have finally found it, it is a feature that is found within the section for partners. greetings

View solution in original post

3 Replies
Highlighted
Contributor II

Re: System requirements tool

Hi

I have used the attached QlikView CPU / RAM sizing for document in the past. But it is only a guideline. 

Note : There are many factors that drive the hardware sizing. So this document is not a one-stop-shop. But it is a good place to start. 

Once you have your apps and server in a beta stage, you could use the Qlik Sense Scalability Tools to check how the apps are using the hardware resources.

https://community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Scalability/Qlik-Sense-Scalability-Tools/gpm-p/1490846#comment-48...

Good luck!

Highlighted
Partner
Partner

Re: System requirements tool

First of all, thank you for answering. What I'm looking for is an online tool that looked like the image below (I had this snapshot of a shipment to a customer).

The point is that now I can't find it on the platform, I don't know if they have unattended it or just changed site.

Greetings

 

configurador.PNG

Highlighted
Partner
Partner

Re: System requirements tool

I have finally found it, it is a feature that is found within the section for partners. greetings

View solution in original post