Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
khigaurav999
Creator
Creator

Qlikview Data Representation

Hi Folks,

I am new to QlikView and facing an issue in representing data in the expected way.

I have below data source that looks like this i.e. highlighted fields I am capturing in data load and representing:

WO Data.jpg

My challenge here is to present it in four records rather 8 records i.e. if you see "High Level Item" field is comman / link b/w WBS Element and Network Number here.  I want to present it as - PO Numer, WBS Element, NetWork Number in four records for this example.

Qlik Representation.jpg

One way I can think of is doing some transformation at Load Scrip level i.e. removing duplicates in High Level Item field and using it a join field b/w other 2 but want to see if there are other better approaches and / or something can be done at object level within this table representation.

Thanks,

Gaurav

7 Replies
karthikoffi27se
Creator III
Creator III

Hi Gaurav,

Try using applymap, finding duplicates with yes and no and use it in the table.

Many Thanks

Karthik

khigaurav999
Creator
Creator
Author

Is there any other way to it rather than apply map? Duplicate is not the problem, high level field is the link b/w other two..,  we need to represent it in a meaningful way i mean i want represent it in 4 records rather than 8.

Peter_Cammaert
Partner - Champion III
Partner - Champion III

There is a simple possible solution, but it only works under strict conditions (no multiple values in the fields-to-be-merged, just a NULL and a single value).

Do not use a table box, but create a straight table and add all common fields as dimensions (e.g. [PO / CR Number], [High Level Item] etc.). Then add the partially filled fields as expressions like for exmaple:

=MaxString([WBS Element])

=MaxString([Network Number])

etc.

But the better solution would be to split the data into different internal tables and let the common fields act as key. Then QlikView will do the heavy lifting.

Or
MVP
MVP

This sounds like a job for GROUP BY.

Load [PO Number],

[High Level Item],

max(WBS_Element) as WBS_Element,

max(Network_Number) as Network_Number

From YourTable

Group By [PO Number],

[High Level Item];

dinuwanbr
Creator III
Creator III

Hi Gaurav,

Try this

on object level

Create a chart and give one Filed (suppose say PO/CR number) as one dimension and other fields as expressions (without any formula).

on script level

you can use join (left join by uploading as two tables) or applymap()

or a group by clause with max()

Rgds,

Tharindu

khigaurav999
Creator
Creator
Author

Thanks. I am receiving following error.. what is wrong?

Invalid expression

ZASR32:

LOAD [Sales Doc Type],

    [Sales Document] as Document,

    Item,

    [High Level Item],

    Material,

    [Material Description],

    max([WBS Element]) as [WBS Element],

    [PO Description] as [PO Description ZASR32],

    max([Network Number]) as [Network Number]

FROM

[File Location]

(ooxml, embedded labels, table is ZASR32_RPT_062117)

GROUP BY [Sales Document],[High Level Item];


Peter_Cammaert
Partner - Champion III
Partner - Champion III

In a LOAD statement that has a GROUP BY clause, all fields that are not listed in the GROUP BY clause should be used as parameter in a call of an aggregation function like max(), sum() or count(). Or Shohams code complies with that rule. But you added a lot of fields that aren't present in an aggregation function call and are not present in the GROUP BY clause.

You can use

LOAD Only([Sales Doc Type]) AS [Sales Doc Type],

     [Sales Document] as Document,

     Only(Item) AS Item,

     [High Level Item],

     Only(Material) AS Material,

     Only([Material Description]) AS [Material Description],

     max([WBS Element]) as [WBS Element],

     Only([PO Description]) as [PO Description ZASR32],

     max([Network Number]) as [Network Number]

FROM [File Location](ooxml, embedded labels, table is ZASR32_RPT_062117)

GROUP BY [Sales Document],[High Level Item];

But only if for these new fields there is only one value for every combination of the GROUP BY field values.

Best,

Peter