Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Not applicable

help with set analysis

Good morning,

I am struggling with this problem that involves set analysis. My objective is to calculate the count of inspections but considering different weights for each Category (2 and 3 have double weight) if MotivoID is 1, because if it is 2 should be single weight as it is for categories 1, 6 and 7.

My code is:

= (if(Ano > 2011 and MotivoID <> 2,

          ( 2 * Count({$< CategoriaID = {"2"} >}  InspeccaoID ) +

//          Count({$< CategoriaID = {"2"} >}  InspeccaoID ) +

//          Count({$< CategoriaID = {"3"} >}  InspeccaoID ) +

          2 * Count({$< CategoriaID = {"3"} >}  InspeccaoID ) +

 

          Count({$< CategoriaID = {"1"} >}  InspeccaoID ) +

          Count({$< CategoriaID = {"6"} >}  InspeccaoID ) +

          Count({$< CategoriaID = {"7"} >}  InspeccaoID )

          ))

          +

          if(Ano > 2011,

          count({$ <[MotivoID] = {"2"}>} InspeccaoID)))

So far it hasn't gave me the results I am looking for.

Any help will be very helpful.

Thanks in advance,

afonso

4 Replies
shahamel
Creator
Creator

Would you be so kind to send me a small file with an inline table which gives me a small example containing the fields:

Ano, MotivoID, CategoriaID and InspecaoID

In the meantime you can also use this document:

http://www.google.nl/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=p%20possible%20e%20exclude%20qlikview&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCo...

Not applicable
Author

I think I managed to find a solution that solve my problem.

Thanks to all that try to help me.

Not applicable
Author

Thanks Sandeep. With all this notes I managed to solve my problem.

Best regards,

Afonso Lopes

De: Sandeep Hamelink

Enviada: segunda-feira, 12 de Agosto de 2013 12:29

Para: Afonso Lopes

Assunto: - Re: help with set analysis

<http://community.qlik.com/index.jspa> QlikCommunity

Re: help with set analysis

created by Sandeep Hamelink <http://community.qlik.com/people/shahamel> in New to QlikView - View the full discussion <http://community.qlik.com/message/377835#377835>