Could you please someone help me to correct the set expression. I have two tables, on first table showing the groups and count of users. Second table showing the user details. Users can have multiple groups. If i select multiple groups on first table then users coming in common needs to show on user details table. For example in the attached application if i select group A,B,C then second table should show only the user 1 details, basically filter all sheet objects based on the selected groups in first table with intersect records
Thank you swuehland dwforest ! for the response. In both the cases, the second user table will show records not part of the current selection. For example if we select Group A,B,C then we have only one user in common that is User 1 but table will show other users as well. Is there any way to avoid these records from User table without adding any extra calculation column.
As Stefan implies, you must have a measure in the table with the set expression to "filter" the records. If you don't want an "extra" column, you can do a Stefan indicates to display the name as your aggregate. Caveat to that is that measures are not filterable, if your selection yields multiple users that you would like to select in the second table as filters, you'd have to have another column; i usually stick them on the right end of the table as a "flag" field.