Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
OK, thanks to you QV Forum contributors, I think I've got the Active Directory Authenticated Bind down to a science. But, now my client wants to also integrate their non-AD LDAP servers (SunOne v5.2, specifically) and the AD-friendly CONNECT string I've been using doesn't work.
Currently, all my failing attempts at authentication revert back to an anonymous login/bind, which only returns the ADsPath field. This field's rows look like the following:
LDAP://acme.com/uid=djnorton@acme.com,ou=peanutgallery,o=acme.com
This, parsed and coupled with some targeted WHERE-clause filtering, can be handy for yea/nay type lookups (Ex. Is User X part of Group Y?), but it's less ideal than getting proper Common Name, etc... fields.
Has anyone had experience with non-AD LDAP authenticated connections? Would you mind sharing a sanitized example of your CONNECT string?
Thanks,
DJ
P.S. The only Sun-LDAP pages that Google turns up for QlikView are marketing brochures, saying that QV supports Sun-LDAP. OK, so... how?!
OK, so it's the ADsDSOObject provider that's the limiting factor here. It's apparently AD-only, and will not work properly for non-AD LDAP. That's why it returns only the ADsPath field, and tosses any other fields that are returned.
It appears, too, that the Sun-LDAP support is then limited to the Server-side Configurable LDAP setting, and not for direct query from an application's script.
Someone please correct me if you have better information.
OK, so it's the ADsDSOObject provider that's the limiting factor here. It's apparently AD-only, and will not work properly for non-AD LDAP. That's why it returns only the ADsPath field, and tosses any other fields that are returned.
It appears, too, that the Sun-LDAP support is then limited to the Server-side Configurable LDAP setting, and not for direct query from an application's script.
Someone please correct me if you have better information.
Hello!
This is exactly what I'm trying to do, using the same ADsDSOObject provider. Does anyone else do this, what would the provider look like? Thank you for any help!