Do not input private or sensitive data. View Qlik Privacy & Cookie Policy.
Skip to main content

Announcements
Qlik Open Lakehouse is Now Generally Available! Discover the key highlights and partner resources here.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
vanderson009
Creator III
Creator III

Chart Presentation

Hello Community,

I have sample data as like below.

LOAD * Inline [

TouchPoint, Date, ResponseNo

billing, 07/01/2014, 123

billing, 06/01/2014, 234

billing, 05/01/2014, 345

billing, 04/01/2014, 453

devices, 07/01/2014, 345

devices, 06/01/2014, 234

devices, 05/01/2014, 342

devices, 04/01/2014, 546

network, 07/01/2014, 466

network, 06/01/2014, 654

network, 05/01/2014, 456

network, 04/01/2014, 567

online, 07/01/2014, 345

online, 06/01/2014, 342

online, 05/01/2014, 245

online, 04/01/2014, 543

];

By using this data i want output as like Table 02 but by default i get out put as like Table 01.

-- Thanks in advance

Villyee

5 Replies
ThornOfCrowns
Specialist II
Specialist II

What are the columns in Table02?

Specifically, what is the relationship of the single MonthName to your data - it isn't Max or Min - and what is that figure in brackets?

vanderson009
Creator III
Creator III
Author

Hi James,

Thanks for your quick resonse.

My first column is TouchPoint, Second column is Monthname. i have four Months which are common

for each touch point and in bracket there is sum(Response) per Month.

Hope you understand.

-- Thanks

Villyee

ali_hijazi
Partner - Master II
Partner - Master II


do you mean you want for billing show the sum of responseNo for min date available then for devices the next month and so on?

I can walk on water when it freezes
MK_QSL
MVP
MVP

How billing is 2109?

devices 1388 coming?

Can you explain your logic pls?

vanderson009
Creator III
Creator III
Author

sum of response is related to MonthName field, Which is not related to TouchPoint.

But if we click over any one of the touch point then respective touchpoint response per month

will come.

Thanks Manish, Hope you understand my reuirement.