Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
For below I am using QV version - 11.2 SR4
I have always had trouble with aggregating my data as "Group by" statements in scripts have always taken too long for my comfort.
For example, to group by 23 million records (2 columns - ID and Sales) it takes me 10 mins.
Table_Group:
Load ID,Sum(Sales)
Resident Table
Group By ID;
Instead of this, If I Order by my data by ID and then run the same Group by clause, I get results backs in less that 2 mins.
Table_Sort:
Load ID,Sales
Resident Table
Order by ID;
Table _Group:
NoConcatenate Load ID,Sum(Sales)
Resident Table_Sort
Group By Table_Sort;
I would have believed QV to internally perform this step, but explicitly implementing this has improved my query times by 500%.
I have tables with 40 columns (36 of which to be grouped by and 4 to be summed) and the query time has gone from 18 to 6 mins.
I have just ensured that my Order By column list is the same as Group By Column List.
So, If Order by is "Order By Column1,Column2,Column3" then Group by is "Group By Column1,Column2,Column3"
I would love to hear back if others in the community also have faced similar challenges and whether this or any other method has helped them improve Group by Performance.
Folks i am trying to achieve this with my group by, but i am getting this error. I don't understand, if its working there. 😞
@sunny_talwar @rupindo_barcap @jonopitchford Pl help me.
I think you are grouping by Table_Sort whereas you might want to Group By ID 🙂
Thanks!
But Post above directed me such way, bit confused even when i am trying. Anyway i will check performance this way.
Many Thanks! It's actually working.
My reload time was decreased up-to some extent, anyway i will test it on huge data sets as well. As per my understanding in this procedure the order by is doing the required alignment of data for group by, which actually helps Group by to work on spontaneously with every unique data field/no. Beside checking for field/no to do grouping on-every individual occurrence.
Thanks,
HirisH
I'm using Qlik sense 13.42.1.
I think Qlik has now optimized this. In case we prefix the 'group by' with 'order by' operation, the data model takes a few seconds more to load.
Thanks for sharing this.
Hi All,
I tested this technique on a 173 million records data, Without Orderby Sort, it took 10 min for one aggregation in groupby.
With using order by before group by it actually took 4min to load the 173 million data.
However, There is no changes on overall app run time, it only optimized group by performance. Because whatever the time we save for groupby, orderby will eat that time. So overall app run time has no improvement.
Still, very good and useful technique. Thank you.