Do not input private or sensitive data. View Qlik Privacy & Cookie Policy.
Skip to main content

Announcements
Join us in Bucharest on Sept 18th for Qlik's AI Reality Tour! Register Now
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Not applicable

Set Analysis - no equal to does not work

Hi,

Please let me know what is wrong with the below syntax:

=count (
{<
[FLAG] = {'I'}, [STATUS] <> {'CIO Review'}
>}
Distinct RAV_CASE_ID
)

Thanks,

Sudha.

5 Replies
Agis-Kalogiannis
Employee
Employee

You cannot use <> in set analysis.

You can do something like

[STATUS] =- {'CIO Review'}

Can you try and let me know?

Thanks

Agis

Not applicable
Author

Hi Agis,

Thanks for your help!

Still I am getting some error; not sure what I am missing -

=count (
{<
[FLAG] = {'I'}, [STATUS] =- {'CIO Review'}>}
Distinct RAV_CASE_ID

Gysbert_Wassenaar
Partner - Champion III
Partner - Champion III

The syntax checker of the expression editor has a bug that causes it to incorrectly flag the -= construction as a syntax error. It isn't, the syntax checker is in error.


talk is cheap, supply exceeds demand
Not applicable
Author

Oh Ya!  That's right. It's working fine now.  Thank you

Agis-Kalogiannis
Employee
Employee

Can you please mark one of the answers as helpful or correct so as to close the discussion?

I would appreciate it.

Thanks

Agis