Skip to main content
Announcements
Customer Spotlight: Discover what’s possible with embedded analytics Oct. 16 at 10:00 AM ET: REGISTER NOW
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
warrentk80
Creator
Creator

do not consider a filter on a field in the set analysis

Goodmorning everyone

I would need to not consider the application of a filter in a setanalisys formula.

I'll explain.

with the $ command the setanalisys receives all the filters, with 1 it does not consider them.

how can I not select a field and not all.

this is the formula I inserted
Sum ({$ <[Question Phase] = {'Acceptance'} [Idea])

if you select a date the formula shows the data for the selected date, while I would need that by changing the date, the formula still shows the data of all the dates.

I also ask you how in the SetAnalysis the comparison with the fields null () is made.

in the previous example, how to consider the idea in the application, acceptance and null phase.

Thank you all for your cooperation

Andrew

1 Reply
micheledenardi
Specialist II
Specialist II

Here the change you have to use on your set analysis if you want to obtain the expected result.


Sum ({$ <[Question Phase] = {'Acceptance'},YourDateField=>} [Idea]).


It's not clear what you want to achieve with the null fields()... I suggest you to avoid null values in your fields by handle null() during the script load by using something like:


Load

     If(isnull(Field1) or trim(Field1)='', 'Null Value',Field1) as Field1,

     ...

     ...

From XXXYYY;

Michele De Nardi
If a post helps to resolve your issue, please accept it as a Solution.