Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
| month | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20331 | 21596 | 16832 |
| 2 | 20802 | 22255 | 17797 |
| 3 | 19272 | 23013 | 18037 |
| 4 | 19993 | 21338 | 17799 |
| 5 | 20719 | 23831 | 19521 |
| 6 | 26881 | 24096 | 21399 |
| 7 | 21272 | 20979 | 19885 |
| 8 | 10639 | 21726 | 18141 |
| 9 | 0 | 21272 | 17512 |
| 10 | 0 | 19739 | 18198 |
| 11 | 0 | 20928 | 19741 |
| 12 | 0 | 19650 | 20104 |
| avg | 13326 | 21702 | 18747 |
i would suggest.. you keep the coming months values to be as Nulls.
That should fix your average expression.
Hi,
please see the attached example.
Maybe it´s helpful to get the right idea.
Good luck!
Rainer
Hi,
Or, if you prefer set analysis:
avg({<[2012]=[2012]-{0}>}[2012])
Regards,
David