qvd1 concatenate qvd2 storing into another qvd ? new qvd is optimized or unoptimized qvd? pls tell me?

[#1]

qvd 1

concatenate

qvd2

store   this  result as    mkc.qvd

mkc  called optimized or unoptimized  ?

[IAMDV]

If you load the MKC.QVD directly then it will be optimized load.

Thanks,

DV

www.QlikShare.com

[#3]

result  mkc  qvd  called optimized  right

[maxgro]

optimized or not optimized is a feature of the load of a qvd

if you load mkc with a

LOAD * FROM mkc.qvd (qvd);

it should be optimized

also it should be an optimized load if you rename/omit fields or use exists (one field) function

[swuehl]

manojqlik,

in my understanding, you don't call a qvd unoptimized or optimized, but you call a qvd LOAD unoptimized or optimized.

If a qvd LOAD is optimized or not depends on several things, you'll find more details in many discussion here in the forum (search button is your friend) or for example here:

http://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlikview-optimised-qvd-loads/

In general, if you load from your qvd without any transformations and filters, like

LOAD * FROM qvdfile.qvd (qvd);

it should be an optimized load.