Do not input private or sensitive data. View Qlik Privacy & Cookie Policy.
Skip to main content

Announcements
Join us in Toronto Sept 9th for Qlik's AI Reality Tour! Register Now
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Not applicable

set analysis 'not equal to ' syntax

Hi All,

I want to achieve the foll: with set analysis

count of id where field a<> field b

i tried  '<>' and '-='.

But, both did not work.

Please help me out.

Thanks,

Anju

22 Replies
Not applicable
Author

Thank You!

Yes,

it is giving me the correct result.

But, what if , they were to introduce values other than 0 and 1?

cn_sa_dev
Partner - Contributor III
Partner - Contributor III

Hi Anju,

I'm not aware of a way to compare two fields in set analysis - searching through the community I didn't see any answers either:

Set Analysis Issue - Comparing two Fields

Set analysis - comparing two field

You could either use an IF, or use exclusions as I did above with set analysis.  If you use the set analysis exclusions you will have to hardcode the values as you can't directly compare them - so if the values change the set analysis will also have to change.  Not an elegant solution but it's a workaround.

I've created an idea for this, please vote for it if you'd like this functionality in set analysis... 

http://community.qlik.com/ideas/3184

Not applicable
Author

As per the Reference Maual: " If you want to force exclu- sion of specific field values, you will need to use “~” in front of the field name. "

<~YOURFIELDA = YOURFIELDB>

That would be the same as YOURFIELDA <> YOURFIELDB